User talk:Junes
Hi and (a belated) welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Don't worry if you're unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia. Be bold!
The most useful page for newcomers is the tutorial. Once you are used to editing text, you may want to take a look at the picture tutorial. If you do a lot of copyedits, the Manual of Style will be very useful.
Nobody is expected to be familiar with the details of Wikipedia policies or etiquette right away. However, two basic guidelines that help make Wikipedia successful are: avoid bias and be civil. Every contribution helps Wikipedia develop great articles, while the very best become Featured Articles. Much more information can be found at the Community Portal.
When you want a laugh, drop by the unusual articles list. By the way, when on a talk page or vote page, you can sign your edit with your username and date stamp by typing four tildes (~~~~). If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - BanyanTree 16:22, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Burundi Civil War
[edit]You voted for Burundi Civil War, this week's CSB Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. - BanyanTree 20:39, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Alright, I've removed most of the spots/specks/dirt from the image, although I don't think they were that distracting. I've seen worse-looking, dirtier images become featured pictures. --brian0918™ 13:55, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
COTW Project
[edit]You voted for Decolonization, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Tony Jin | (talk) 02:19, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
COTW Project
[edit]You voted for Culture of Ancient Rome, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.
COTW Project
[edit]You voted for Roaring Twenties, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Falphin 03:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Simpsons quotes
[edit]Yay you! I would have done it myself (i.e. deleted from brunch), but I was beginning to think there was some obscure wiki rule I would be breaking. I love the Simpsons, but not here. --Mothperson 13:44, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Heheh, thanks. Be bold! ;) Junes 15:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
COTW Project
[edit]You voted for High Middle Ages, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.
Discussion at Talk:Pakistan
[edit]Would you like to join the animated discussion on the Pakistan's talk page? The current issue is whether "Pakistan is famous for its support of Taliban and 9/11 terrorist" is a suitable sentence to start the article's first paragraph. Your contribution would be much appreciated, as the current discussion seems to be more of a dialog between Ragib and SamTr014 Talk:Pakistan. Thanks !--Sheikhu 07:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Pim Fortuyn
[edit]Hi, you added a POV notice to the Pim Fortuyn page. I feel the article has much improved since then, and is pretty NPOV by now. I plan on removing the POV notice. Would you care to comment on the Talk page of the article? Thanks. Junes 15:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for involving me (and thanks for working on that article). I added a comment to the talk page as you requested. 128.59.31.237 23:22, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi Junes. I in principle agree with you; however Tellar26 has already indicated that this was his last contribution to this discussion and as it really doesn't matter what length it has — now it is there anyway — I'll now give him my last answer. Soon we'll archive the page :o)--MWAK 06:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Robert Burns Timeline
[edit]Why did you remove the timeline? "Rather unnecessary" isn't much of a reason?
CPMcE 00:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thanks for your reply - I take your point.
Camillus
talk|contribs 13:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC) (BTW, do you like my groovy new signature?)
Sources for Lexical decision task
[edit]Hello, good work on Lexical decision task, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Lexical decision task? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! — BRIAN0918 • 2005-12-4 20:53
Articles For Deletion
[edit]Hi, a while ago you made some comments about the presence of bible-verse articles, and/or source texts of the bible, and you may therefore be interested in related new discussions:
- A discussion about 200 articles, one each for the first 200 verses of Matthew - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/200 verses of Matthew
- A discussion about 18 articles, one each for the first 18 verses of John 20 - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of John 20
- A discussion about whether or not the entire text of a whole bible chapter should be contained in the 6 articles concerning those specific chapters - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Whole bible chapter text.
--Victim of signature fascism | Don't forget to vote in the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections 18:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
VWN en WCN
[edit]Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.
Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 15:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Non-parametric statistics article
[edit]Would you mind contributing to the discussion I began on Talk:Non-parametric statistics? — Chris53516 (Talk) 17:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Pseudoword
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pseudoword , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Allens (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Junes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Junes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)