Talk:Garmin Forerunner
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chip in 405?
[edit]What's the model of the GPS chip in the new Forerunner 405? Anyone know?--169.233.102.41 (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
The 305 and 405 both use a SiRFstarIII according to http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1649742 Could you work that into the article perhaps? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.83.91 (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Additional functionality
[edit]No mention of Heart Rate Monitor (HRM) strap. No mention of foot pod unit (for cadence, or distance when GPS unreliable). No mention of connection to bike speed/cadence unit. No mention that it's waterproof.
Coordinates
[edit]The sentense "The watch uses the hh.mm.mmmm (hours, minutes, and minute decimals) coordinate format." should be changed to The watch uses the hh.mm.mmmm (DEGREES, minutes, and minute decimals) coordinate format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.4.16.229 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Timeline
[edit]Why does the timeline start in 2010? — Preceding unsigned comment added by -Deus Ex Machina- (talk • contribs) 07:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
745 advertising blurb
[edit]Someone may wish to edit this blurb, a single contribution by one account. Cheers, Bansp (talk) 03:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Forerunner 955 does not have the solar charging ring and capability
[edit]Forerunner 955 does not have the solar charging ring and capability 161.69.101.128 (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
965 vs 265 & 265S
[edit]According to wikipedia table, the only advantage of 965 vs 265 is topographic maps.
I'm thinking about buying 265S, which is smallest and lightest of these 3 models. But it has no maps at all?
According to users especially in Finland / Europe, the Garmin topo maps are useless (they used to be better?), as more detailed topo maps can't be installed: