Talk:Canada Line

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canada Line article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 21, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Vancouver Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Canada Line.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Canada Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:SkyTrain (Vancouver)#reverting mass changes to SkyTrain stations, May 2018

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:SkyTrain (Vancouver)#reverting mass changes to SkyTrain stations, May 2018. Joeyconnick (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC) —Joeyconnick (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ridership

@Joeyconnick: Regarding this article, as far as I know, the Daily Hive is a reputable publication for Vancouver news, thus WP:RSOPINION applies for opinion pieces. I have clearly attributed the author in my edit. feminist (talk) 03:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chan is an editor at DailyHive, so it amounts to a self-published source. As Chan is an editor of a news website and not someone who works in public transportation or who studies it (in the formal sense), the inclusion here of his opinion is inappropriate and WP:UNDUE. Not that I actually disagree with the overarching point, but that is just my, and apparently his, personal opinion, and the inclusion of his opinion would be just as inappropriate as the inclusion of mine. Now if DailyHive published an actual journalism piece citing experts or research presenting the same point(s), that would be fine to include. —Joeyconnick (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What? How does being an editor at the Daily Hive make writing about the Canada Line a WP:SPS? I'll restore the content until you can actually support that claim. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've skimmed the article, Chan supports the statements with claim. If TransLink has an issue with it, they can approach the publication for a correction or retraction. I doubt that's going to happen. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"SkyTrain (Canada Line)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SkyTrain (Canada Line). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 3#SkyTrain (Canada Line) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. feminist (+) 08:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]