Talk:Dhole
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dhole article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 360 days |
Dog Article Importance
[edit]Based on the inclusion of the two other large pack-forming members of the canina subtribe in the high-importance class of the dog category, their outsized importance in the understanding of overall canid taxonomy, their endangered status, and their conspicuously complex social nature, I've moved this species into the high-importance class for WikiProject Dogs. --Isnotafox (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Dhole. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/6555_m05n1a2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
List of translations
[edit]This article contains a list of translations that might be more suitable for Wiktionary instead of Wikipedia. Jarble (talk) 20:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- This seems like a good idea to migrate this material over yes. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support. The list is of little value to the article. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Tien Shan dhole extinct?
[edit]I think it is likely the Tien Shan dhole is already extinct. The countries it is listed as occuring in (Russia, a few -stan countries) have had their dhole populations eradicated according to IUCN and I have been unable to find photos from recently of the subspecies. Give me some hint? -Corsican Warrah Israeli Pika 20:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- The cited sources are a bit old for the purpose, and the IUCN is silent on the status of this particular putative subspecies. I can't see any recent articles on it either. I don't think we can say anything specific here ATM. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- See: Makenov, M. 2018. Extinct or extant? A review of dhole (Cuon alpinus Pallas, 1811) distribution in the former USSR and modern Russia. Mammal Research 63 (1): 1–9. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 08:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Dhole DNA was detected in the Pamir Mountains in 2022, which are within the Tien Shan dhole's range, so it is most likely rediscovered (List of Asian animals extinct in the Holocene). The one that might be extinct instead is the Ussuri dhole, which as pointed in Makenov above has not been seen since 2008 and in an area so close to the Tien Shan dhole's range that it might even be it instead. The last record around Ussuri is from the 1970s. I don't believe the photos of supposed Ussuri dholes in captivity in the Ussuri dhole article are actually Ussuri dholes.Menah the Great (talk) 16:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Study on subfossil specimens
[edit]Seems some fossil "dholes" are misidentified wolves. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/2/144/htm Mariomassone (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Therefore, they also raise the possibility that this implies some dhole remains may be currently misidentified as grey wolves. William Harris (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class Dogs articles
- Top-importance Dogs articles
- WikiProject Dogs articles
- B-Class mammal articles
- Mid-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles