Talk:Polish marka

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 5 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Polish mark to Polish marka. The result of the discussion was moved.

Untitled

Why does the Bibliography always disappear?

--Alexvonf 15:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

'Polish marka' redirected to 'Polish mark', then reverted.

See below link for a discussion on the merits of redirecting 'Polish marka' to 'Polish mark' (which was then duly reversed).

Talk:Finnish markka#Move Request

Requested move 5 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. As a procedural reversion of TCG's disruptive moves. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polish mark → Polish marka – The stable title was "Polish marka" until TheCurrencyGuy came up and moved it to "mark" without discussion, arguing that "mark" was more commonly used. TCG's move was then reverted by Oppa gangnam psy, but then TCG moved it once again and denounced OGP's decision as "an attempt to frustrate editing by a user who has since been banned" - in reality, OGP was blocked, not banned, but this is immaterial to this RM.

The above exchange shows that there are some disagreement as to "mark" or "marka", and I would therefore like to submit this page to a procedural RM. Sincerely, NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

we should move it back to the stable name unless someone has a good reason to keep it here—blindlynx 17:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator lest TCG's consensus-less decision prevails. NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Per WP:ENGLISHTITLE. I can't find evidence "marka" is the WP:COMMONNAME. Vpab15 (talk) 11:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 09:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.