Talk:Full Members' Cup

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ZDS Cup

What did the "ZDS" stand for? Was it Zenith Data Systems? Should this be mentioned in the article?

Where was the final played?

Where was the final of this cup played each year? Was it at Wembley like the other English cups? --Ukdan999 17:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe so--Mas 18 dl (talk) 13:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophe

Should this not be Full Members' Cup? Mooretwin (talk) 11:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. Cups are often named to indicate who is eligible to enter. The cup for the whole world is the World Cup, the cup for the entire FA is the FA Cup, the cup for members of the league is the League Cup, the cup for all Europe's cup winners is (was) the European Cup Winners Cup, the name of the Champions League trophy is the European Champions Cup since it was originally a cup for domestic champions. Not World's Cup, FA's Cup, League's Cup, Cup Winners' Cup, Champions' Cup. Without a citation either way, it makes more sense to stick with the common practice. Binabik80 (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Final

I've added Lee Glover, Steve Wood and David Lee to this substitutes list and included time details of Chettle replacing Pearce. Should this final not have its own page? The others seem to?Statto74 (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Full Members Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101102235351/http://www.statto.com:80/ to http://www.statto.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]