User talk:Supermorff

Welcome!

Hello, Supermorff, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at the Guide to layout, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Full details on Wikipedia style can be found in the Manual of Style.

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:04, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

WoD articles et al

What's with all that merging in the World of Darkness? You spent the last two days merging perfectly fine articles into larger ones, without discussing the redirects anywhere with anyone. I'm not saying the result is wrong (though in the case of the Sabbat and the Camarilla I think it may), but common practice and courtesy demand that you ask beforehand (at least using the merge templates). --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Does it? I apologise. My additions of merge templates tend to be ignored in other areas, so I've developed the sometimes unfortunate habit of acting regardless. Feel free to revert... well... whatever. I realise that the Sect merge may have been slightly over the top, though I think the rest was probably worth it. -- Supermorff 14:06, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, what does common practice and courtesy demand about replying to these comments on my talk page? It's never happened before. -- Supermorff 14:08, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some people reply in the same place, others use the other person's talk page. I prefer doing it like this, so that the talk pages do look like there were two people talking.

If other people ignore your merge tags, one thing you can do is go to the history of the page and find who were the major contributors. Unless they were odd one-time editors, they probably have something to say. Of course, nobody "owns" anything here and nobody individually has any rights on a particular page (that's why it's courtesy, not law). Another thing you can do is ask for others to take a look, by dropping a comment at WP:RFC or WP:DA or WP:CU. WP:DA is for merge proposals especifically; WP:CU is cleanup (if an article needs to be summarized and then merged, for example, you could list it there). WP:RFC is for comments on article content. Before any of this, of course, do use the merge templates, and be patient. ;) I'm probably going to un-merge Sabbat and Camarilla, but I need to take a close look at the rest. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 20:44, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's cool. Be aware that with some of them I did add some information of my own (not a lot, mind you). Thanks for the advice, by the way. You may notice I added a merge template on one of the other WoD pages. I forget which one, however. Ah well. -- Supermorff 20:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers

I just wanted to personally thank you for making alterations in category to the Power Rangers planets et al. I'm glad you are working to help these articles and others. Once again, thank you :) --Shawn 20:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hector Elizondo

(The rest of this discussion at Talk:Hector Elizondo)

I'm Sorry, I didn't realize that I had reverted the "cats" which you added. I promise that I'll fix that. It great to have people lkie you in the Pedia who believe in the art of conversasion instead of jumpimg to a heated discussion. Thank you, Tony the Marine 18:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb09

Hi i'm a n00b so uh ya could you help me with the article codes ciphers & other cryptic & clandestine communication Caleb09

!

What is a long paragraph about Guns n' Moses doing on a Nic Sampson page (even though it is his fomer band)?

I do not know. I merely added the category to that page and had very little to do with its actual content. -- Supermorff 18:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minnie Goodsoup

I saw you corrected the name Minnie Stronie to Minestrone. However I think that her full name was Minerva Stronie Goodsoup. Pictureuploader 20:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was it? Very well then. -- Supermorff 20:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power Rangers series

I don't think there is really any need for this category. It is essentially going to be a list of the series, as you are organizing them by the order of production. This was removed from the main Category:Power Rangers because it was disruptive to the flow of the category. Please stop adding the series to this category. Ryulong 21:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Cease and desist order has been received. Although I disagree with you about the so-called "flow" of the category. If anything, I think spacing them around the category instead of ordering them chronologically has itself disrupted the flow of the category, which was why I selected this time to create the new one. As a compromise, is it acceptable for me to move all the articles out of the parent category to the subcategory as I had intended, but ordering them alphabetically instead of chronologically? -- Supermorff 21:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That I can agree with, however, I think that the series should be kept in the parent category, as well. Ryulong 21:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will assist you with this, and remove it from CFD. Ryulong 21:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Your help is much appreciated. -- Supermorff 21:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I now agree with your suggestion to remove them from the parent category. There are very little (if any) articles that are listed in both a parent and subcategory. Ryulong 22:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and most of them are representative of the subcategory as a whole (as, for example, Zord and Category:Zords). I'll help remove them from the parent category. -- Supermorff 22:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you beat me to it. -- Supermorff 22:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my actions earlier. Ryulong 22:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Glad we could come to an agreement on it. -- Supermorff 22:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers Characters Template

I've already created a main page for the SPD Power Rangers by moving B-Squad Rangers and doing what I did to Ninja Storm Power Rangers. Now, I'm not sure if we should remove the links for the Other Rangers in the template, especially those that aren't really affiliated with the main teams (Magna Defender, Mike Corbett, Quantum Ranger), however, a lot of the other ones can be eliminated. Ryulong 21:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's tricky. On the one hand it would be nice to clear up that template, streamline it, with only the teams on there. On the other hand, those characters aren't well linked to from the team articles. It might be preferable to put these extraneous characters in brackets, e.g. Time Force Power Rangers (Quantum Ranger), just to differentiate them from the actual teams. What do you think? -- Supermorff 09:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, and May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg ^{(drop me a line)} 20:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gargoyles voice actors

Here is the category, Category:Gargoyles voice actors. But yeah, it should be noted on the characters main articles. Hurry up and decide something cause it has been proposed for deletion. I'd work on it, but now I'm fixin' the Gargoyles redirects which are like all over Wikipedia. I hope you log on quick and make that decision. See ya. Power level (Dragon Ball) 18:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm aware that a category already exists. I created it. The suggestion on the talk page was specifically to create a list because the category was up for deletion. I assume you're happy with a list instead, if it does end up being deleted? Or even if it doesn't? -- Supermorff 18:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever works. I trust that you'll do what ya gotta do, right? Power level (Dragon Ball) 18:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Sonic games}} inclusion criteria

Sorry, I meant to add this note to your talk page much earlier, but was busy at the time: :sweatdrop:

An inclusion criteria for {{Sonic games}} and related templates has been proposed at Template talk:Sonic games#Totally new inclusion criteria, with an introductory preamble at #Shadow III: Son of Shadow, #Proposed inclusion criteria, and #Inclusion of Sonic Rush. You are cordially invited to discuss the proposal.

—davidh.oz.au 23:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me about the current template discussion. I've now looked over the proposal and commented on it. -- Supermorff 13:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Gargoyles (TV series)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Supermorff! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pack (Gargoyles)

Just a quick note to thank you for adding sources to those uncited statements.... These articles have them in spades... --Alex Nought 13:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for a Gargoyles page

I've recently submitted some more (Courtesy of comics)info for the Gargoyles characters, especially the Illuminati. That said, would you consider making a page for the Illuminati of the Gargoyle Universe. Thanks! 71.115.192.199 23:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mutate (Gargoyles)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Mutate (Gargoyles), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 20:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On that note, should the clones be transfered to the Mutates page, since they are part of the same clan? It certainly would add more sginificance. 74.61.186.169 00:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Owen Burnett

I have nominated Owen Burnett, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Burnett. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jay32183 (talk) 22:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anton Sevarius

I have nominated Anton Sevarius, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Sevarius. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jay32183 (talk) 08:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anton Sevarius

I have nominated Anton Sevarius, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Sevarius. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jay32183 (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Glass Walkers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Glass Walkers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Not my idea; I hope you can add a little bit to save it. Bedford 00:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archmage (Gargoyles)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Archmage (Gargoyles), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cirt (talk) 15:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A project you might like...

Hey, we've been working on a Name Wiki, wiki.name.com. We saw the contributions you made to the Baby Names Wiki - and thought perhaps you have an interest in names? Then we discovered that you're also a wiki expert. We'd love your thoughts/help/ideas, if you're interested. For example, we're trying to define what the "origin" of a name means? The original language? Also, we're thinking about certain "name blogs" that would be fun to write -- and we're looking for writers... And, of course, there are lots of names to write about... Get in touch, if you're interested. thanks!! Clarissa Caldwell (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your ook

hey, I was thinking to change the text of Template:User_orangutan to the text you have. Hope you don't mind. Pdbailey (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knock yourself out. -- Supermorff (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Lady and the Tramp characters

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Lady and the Tramp characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Lady and the Tramp characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Lady and the Tramp characters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Gargoyles

I have nominated Category:Gargoyles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Gargoyles (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glass Walkers for deletion

The article Glass Walkers is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass Walkers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Donald Duck universe characters

Category:Donald Duck universe characters, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Villains in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Villains in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villains in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MBisanz ^talk 22:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Planeteer, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Planeteer" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Planeteer

The article Planeteer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY not asserted or established, after 8 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Power Rangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Power Rangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Power Rangers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ken (given name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kendrick, Dicken and Kenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claudia Katz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Star Wars: Clone Wars and Sit Down, Shut Up. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Supermorff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Supermorff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omni-Viewer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Omni-Viewer. Since you had some involvement with the Omni-Viewer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Power Rangers

Hello, Supermorff. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Power Rangers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RPG Museum

Hi there! :) I'm not sure if I have approached you before, but I have noted your work on the fandom site exporting articles from Wikipedia. I am of the mind that this sort of thing can be a two-way relationship; that is, if people working on that site can find good independent reliable sources for articles there, then it would be great to bring those same sources back here to Wikipedia. :) I also think that it would be a good way to introduce new topics from the fandom site that do not yet have articles here, or to reintroduce topics that were previously deleted due to the notability guidelines, as long as sufficient sources can be found. To that end, I would like to mention that if you see any articles on Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games/Article alerts/Archive that were deleted for notability reasons, as an administrator I can provide a copy of the delete text for you to use and develop. Keep up the good work! BOZ (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BOZ, thank you for getting in touch and for that list. That sounds like an excellent idea, although I have to be honest that it's unlikely to happen in the near future just because we don't have very many editors at the RPG Museum (yet!) and I like to ensure that anything we import is made appropriate for the RPG Museum wiki, which is time-consuming. It'll probably be a while before I get through the articles that Wikipedia still does have, let alone the ones it has deleted. But I've bookmarked the page and will keep an eye on it! -- Supermorff (talk) 15:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Sonic Underground characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sonic Underground characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sonic Underground characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 05:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristin Darnell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristin Darnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin Darnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Sonic X characters" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of Sonic X characters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 3#List of Sonic X characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 23:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Main Freedom Fighters in Sonic the Comic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Main Freedom Fighters in Sonic the Comic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 17#Main Freedom Fighters in Sonic the Comic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:TaleSpin characters has been nominated for discussion

Category:TaleSpin characters has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Main Man: Part II(Superman: The Animated Series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Main Man: Part II(Superman: The Animated Series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § The Main Man: Part II(Superman: The Animated Series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Aglaea

added a link pointing to Orchomenus

Charis (mythology)

added a link pointing to Hebe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]