Talk:Maurice Richard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maurice Richard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Maurice Richard is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 4, 2016.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 11, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
January 14, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 4, 2021, and August 4, 2024.

Current status: Featured article

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Sport High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Biographical film

Regarding this edit (which I subsequently modified): is being the subject of a film appropriate for the "Legacy" section? Is it suitable for mention elsewhere in the article? isaacl (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is best suited in the legacy section. Flibirigit (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it could be considered a kind of honour? To me it's just history; calling it a legacy is like saying this Wikipedia article is part of Richard's legacy. If there were a "In popular culture" section (which I'm not necessarily recommending, as I dislike the amorphous, catch-all nature of this type of section) it would fit better there. isaacl (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also dislike the "pop culture" header, that's why I think it's fine as is. Flibirigit (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it as part of Richard's legacy, however, given the many other ways that Richard has made a lasting impact on the game of hockey. isaacl (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the header, pop culture or legacy, then pick something else like "In Film." Maybe it will go well with The Hockey Sweater, which is a short film that's already covered in the legacy section. Flibirigit (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Hockey Sweater is different; it's an iconic story for Canadians (due in no small part to the NFB short). "Personal life" could probably be renamed to something like "Post-retirement" and then the film could be mentioned there. isaacl (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lose any sleep over this. I suggest asking more of the hockey community for a consensus. I have nothing else to say. Flibirigit (talk) 06:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the purpose of this thread; I'm asking interested parties for their views to reach a consensus. isaacl (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]