Talk:Granholm v. Heald
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Granholm v. Heald article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussion header
[edit]Basically a great article, but, law buffs, when you can, please explain the names of the litigants if they are not self-explanatory when writing a court case article, if you have access to this information. Even more detail would be good, such as whether the case involved the person per se or ex officio. (For example, "Baker" in Baker v. Carr was a voter and hence suing per se; "Carr" was Secretary of State for Tennessee and was sued ex officio as the state official responsible for enforcing voting laws, publishing maps of voting districts, and the like.) Rlquall 04:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Problems
[edit]The [Ref] links in the last section of the article are broken.
The Consequences section says that Michigan joined 15 other states that do not allow any direct shipping to consumers. According to the Wine Institute, 37 states allow at least some form of direct shipping. These claims contradict each other since that comes out to more than 50 (or 51 with D.C.) states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q1w2e3r4t5y6u7 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- C-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of food and drink
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Michigan articles
- Low-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles