Jump to content

Talk:Fresno, California/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

what year was Fresno founded, and who was fresno founded by?

Under Notable residents, would someone please rewrite the sentence that begins "Plus, like Brad Basmajian (Monsters ... " so that a general readership might understand what this is about? Perhaps this is a matter of "everybody knows" for whoever added this passage, but for the rest of us, the reference means nothing. Expand, explain, and illuminate. Try to avoid syntax that starts a sentence with "Plus, like ..." Thank you. ---dph--- Never mind. It has been deleted.

Tagging

Who is the authority that goes around tagging articles as inferior in quality? Shouldn't whoever tags the article also state specifically what it is in the article that fails to meet Wikipedia standards? Does the tagger claim any authority or standing to judge others' work or is the tagger simply an officious prig? If the tagger wishes the article to adhere to a higher standard, why doesn't the tagger undertake the editing him(her)self? 216.165.146.49

I agree with the above. Whoever tags articles for improvement needs to leave some feedback to point out areas for improvement. There is room for improvement on all Wikipedia articles -- help the contributors out by pointing out problems. 68.167.204.244

fresnorealtor.com

Apparently someone at "fresnorealtor.com" believes that Wikipedia exists to provide them with free advertising. Whoever it is, I hope they stop disrupting by posting their fresnorealtor.com junk spam. -Willmcw 08:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

outlets and shopping malls

It's pretty sad how people define their home town by what chain outlets exist at what malls (damn we're alomst as good as any other town now), but that's a facet of Fresno mentality alright! --CodeGeneratR 00:29, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I've noticed that too. But hey, residents can take pride in the fact that there may be no other city in the world whose chain store outlets are as well catalogued as those of Fresno. -Willmcw 02:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The listing of shopping malls is, in my opinion, pathetic. It communicates nothing encyclopedic, and tells a reader that Fresno has so little to offer that residents brag about the availability of Old Navy jeans in town. I think the entire section should be removed.Uucp 18:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

'local attractions' needs a major edit

The tone now is wrong for an encyclopedia. Large blocks of marketing text copied verbatim from organization websites, etc. The length of this section should probably be cut by 2/3. Uucp 15:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The Origins and history section needs to be enlarged. As it stands, it jumps from the city's founding to the completion of Friant Dam during World War II with nothing of note happening in between and nothing of note happening since. Any volunteers to undertake this task? 69.129.128.27 16:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Question: What is Steve Perry's link to Fresno? He grew up in Kings County and attended college in Tulare County, but did he ever live in or really near Fresno? Did he play gigs in Fresno when he was in high school or college? Are Hanford, Lemoore and Visalia close enough? 69.129.128.27 17:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Also, I moved Perry's name to its proper place (assuming it belongs at all) in the alphabetized list of Notable residents. 69.129.128.27 17:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Wesson

Should he really be listed under notable Fresno residents? Born in Kansas, reared in the Northwest.Lived on the California coast for most of his adult life.Came to Fresno shortly before crimes.Now resides in San Quentin. California12 11:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

He is absolutely a notable Fresno resident. Made national news, orchestrating a major mass murder, while actually residing in Fresno. No offense, but that's a lot more than Joel C. Ables ever did. And Cher didn't even graduate from Fresno High and she doesn't live here now, yet she's on the list. And Richard Keil lives in the foothills, not Fresno! And for some reason HE'S on the list. So yes. Wesson. Yes. He, at least, actually lived in Fresno. mjustinred 22 December, 2006

revert 44 68.127.93.17

LOOked like a lot of good stuff was removed by anon with no prior contribs.Mikereichold 22:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


Not really a wikipedia user here... Just thought I would point out that we are having a discussion about this entry over at http://www.fresnofamous.com/node/1469. It seems that someone may have been putting their wish list of stores into the article. I don't know if the user that made those edits is available or not. Just thought I'd give a heads up. -Luke The Obscure

Wikipedia article on Steve Perry says he was born in Hanford and moved to Lemoore. It also says that he joined the band Journey but did not found it. Entry under "Notable people" here said he was born in Lemoore and founded the band. I changed list entry so that it is consistent with Perry's Wikipedia article. If Wikipedia article is incorrect, needs to be changed in both places. Also, should provide source. Dphen 15:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Gary Brecher

I'm combining the discussions related to Brecher in one section, partly in hopes that this page will be archived before it gets too much longer.

The guy doesn't exist - so he's not from Fresno

The Gary Brecher guy is completely ficticious, never been seen, etc. If he's from Fresno, shouldn't there be some sort of record? Please produce some sort of support for your claim that he's from Fresno!

Our article about Gary Brecher lists him as being from Fresno. The discussion/decision about his existence should occur on that article's talk page. If he is demonstrably fictitious then we might move him down to a section of "fictional Fresno residents". -Will Beback 23:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
You're arguing that if I can't prove that he does not exist we should include him. But you cannot prove a negative like this. I think that if he is a notable Fresnan then there has to be some evidence of this. There is none. If he really exists and is from Fresno then there should be some record, something in a local newspaper, something that connects him with Fresno.
He is a notable writer who claims to be from Fresno. There is no verifiable evidence that he is fake, and there's no reason to exclude him. Dsol 18:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
1. not notable, 2. not a writer (just some neo-nazi's pen name) 3. not from Fresno. Please show some evidence that a) he is notable, and B. he is from Fresno. Why should the good name of Fresno be besmirched by being unjustly related to this jerk?
1.If he's not notable, then nominate his page for deletion. That is not an issue to be decided on every page that links to him. Likewise #2. 3. He claims to be from Fresno, and we note that it's a penname. Calling him a Nazi/jerk just makes you ridiculous. Dsol 19:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Deny fictional Nazi Fresno residence!

The folks above are trying to say that a neo-nazi writer who uses the pen name "Gary Brecher" is from Fresno. There's no record of Gary Brecher ever living in Fresno, and they won't give any, but still they insist on calling him a "Notable resident." I suggest that anybody who is insulted by this simply remove "Gary Brecher" from the list of Notable Residents each time the above people add it back.

Whereas I suggest you stop this disruptive behavior before you get blocked, Mr. CEU ip. You have been through too many of these shennanigans to claim ignorance of the rules here. Dsol 21:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

From WP:Verifiability a non-negotiable rule "Information on Wikipedia must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed."

I'm calling your bluff - put up something "published by a reliable source" that shows that "Brecher" is a Fresno resident, or accept the fact that this Nazi linkspam cannot be placed here. BTW, it's clear that the porno-Fascist giveaway "newspaper" that publishes "Brecher" is not reliable.

Reported for 3RR violation. Dsol 08:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Too bad DSOL! But when you're pushing linkspam for porno-Fascists, you got to do better than "you can't prove he doesn't exist!"

I have reverted the blanking of brecher from the list. Please take the time of your block to consider contributing constructively instead of causing distuption and resorting to child ish name-calling. Dsol 16:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

From WP:Verifiability a non-negotiable rule "Information on Wikipedia must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed."

None of the names on that list have citations, nor should they. The appropriate citations (including the Steve-Sailer interview, which is not self-published) are available on Gary Brecher. From the Sailer interview, published in UPI and cited on Brecher's page:
"...Data entry clerk and self-proclaimed "war nerd" Gary Brecher, from Fresno, Calif..."
Dsol 17:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Accepted practice in stand-alone lists is that for entries with articles, the citations are best places in the parent article. There is no "dilution" of the verification requirements, however, and wikipedia articles are not reliable sources. Something that has passed in the main article as "sliding by" without evidence cannot then be used on another page.
  • The references given in the article are very thin, and given that "Virtually nothing is known for certain about Gary Brecher" I'd be uncomfortable about using them.
  • Also, looking at the guidelines for inclusion of websites I think that effectively daring someone to nominate it for AfD might be ill-advised. While not a strong candidate for deletion, based upon the dearth of outside sources there's a 60/40 chance that this debate is ended by the deletion of the parent article.
There does not appear to be any direct evidence that this person is from fresno. I'm unable at this time to confirm the context of UPI quote. The question is, why is it so important that this person be included in the list (and category!) of Fresnans?
brenneman{T}{L} 00:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
It's not so important, but he does belong here. The anon ip has POV reasons to remove him which I don't want to get into on this page. Brecher's a notable writer (not just online, but in print as well), and has claimed to be from Fresno several times in his articles. I do stand by my assertion that his page would survive an AfD, as for example he passes a criterion for inclusion of writers (published in a periodical with >5k readers). Google and alexa would also serve in his case. Some people (like Steve Sailer) have suggested that he is a pseudonym. I'm fine with noting that on this list, but clearly anyone unfamiliar with Brecher can get that info by clicking through as well. Dsol 01:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I understand the "it's available if they click the link" argument and can see its merits, but we're doing our readers a disservice if we put something in a list that's only "probably" correct. If there exists a writer who's real indentity can be establshed as a "Fresnan" than the thing to do would be to list that person's name here. Then the question of if that person is or is not this Brecher identity would be carried into the (Dolan?) article. But if we can't (outside his own claims) link Brecher to Fresno, it shouldn't go in the list. The problem with claims that require caveats is that in their parent article the for/against arguments can be presented, but in a list or category they get presented as bald facts. - brenneman{T}{L} 02:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Good points. I think that we're basically dealing with the special problems that arise with all reclusive yet notable writers. You're right that it's problematic to state baldly that Brecher is a Fresnan, but then I think it's just as problematic to omit him entirely, especially considering that he has reflected on his Fresno residence at some length in his columns. I will note on the list that he is a possible pseudonym (c.f. Sailer), and the reader can get the details if desirecd on the Brecher page. Dsol 02:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Not to condone the Anon's behavior, but let's try to find a better way. Ls a "media portrayals" list acceptable? Many city articles have them. -Will Beback 02:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

If I understand the objections, it is also that this tenous link to Fresno is being used as linkspam for a purpotedly non-notable entity. The what links here is a bit large. - brenneman{T}{L} 03:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
That could be, but I note that a couple of those were identifiably added by user: Nat Krause, a well-known user, back in August.[1][2] Another was added by an IP that was possibly Stockholm, [3] I suppose that one factor we can use for inclusion is whether his column makes significant references to Fresno, or is simply mentioned in his bio. I havn't read it so I don't know. -Will Beback 03:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
In fact he has written a good deal about Fresno, as well as about other Fresno notables such as Victor Davis Hanson (who also wrote a letter to the eXile to complain about Brecher). I think that listing him under media portrayals is a pretty good compromise, but I think he should stay categorized as a Fresnan. Dsol 11:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

From WP:Verifibility

"The policy

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. 2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. 3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it."

I still haven't seen ANY citations of any reputable source that says ANYTHING about "Brecher." The UPI article by Sailor was notable only in that he did not actually meet "Brecher" and thinks that he is a pseudonym. It said NOTHING about Fresno.

There is one potential disreputable sources about "Brecher," the "newspaper" he writes for in Moscow, Russia. Let's keep this discussion short - it published a pornographic cover the week after 9/11/01 mocking the victims of 9/11. Nobody would think it's a reputable source for anything.

So please follow the rule and fufill your "obligation to provide a reputable source." This goes for "media portrayals" as well as "notable residents." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.141.187.170 (talk • contribs) .

trouble brewing

Let's be clear on something - removing material as "unsourced" is not vandalism, and should not be referred to as such. It's bad form to insist on "your" version while discussion is going on, but it's not vandalism, and using "rv" when rolling back to your preferred version is actually worse. While no one is close to a 3RR violation right now, there's no entitelement to a certain number of reverts, does everyone understand that? - brenneman{T}{L} 13:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

rv is simply revert, as opposed to rvv for revert vandalism. You're right, this reverting is not really productive. Maybe a formal call for consensus is in order? Dsol 13:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

You should really familiarize yourself with the rules. Consensus is not an option for over-riding the verifiability rule.

"Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's three content-guiding policy pages. The other two are Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in the main namespace. The three policies are complementary, non-negotiable, and cannot be superseded by any other guidelines or by editors' consensus."

82.141.187.170 14:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I assure you that I have a passing familiarity with the relevent guidelines. ^_^ What we're trying to do here is decide what is verifiable and to what level. My current prefered option is for the author of whom this is the suspected pseudonym to be included iff he can be confirmed as a fresno-ian, and for the web entity to be linked from that article. But really, we're all here to work together, so just have a little patience. The earth isn't going to fall into the sun if we've got the wrong version (whatever that is) linked for a few days. I'd ask that neither if the parties involved revert again, no matter how much it's killing you to see the other version on the page. - brenneman{T}{L} 14:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry - the "you" referred to DSOL, who called for a consensus to over-ride the verifiability rule, which is not an option.

82.141.187.170 14:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

How about removing Brecher from the list of notable figures, but leaving in a mention of him in the Media Coverage section? Clearly the fact that he has written a good deal about Fresno is verifiable (in fact links to some of his articles about Fresno exist in the article about him). Would this satisfy everyone? Dsol 16:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
All you have to do (and all you've ever had to do) is show a reputable source that says that he gives Fresno media coverage (or is a Fresno resident for your original entry). But clearly the Fascist "newspaper" in Moscow isn't a reputable source on anything, so find a reputable source that says he gives media coverage to Fresno. I'm sure the problem is that there is no reputable source that says this, simply because he isn't at all notable - just a bunch of nonsense made up by the Fascist "newspaper." In which case he doesn't belong. Period. 82.141.187.170 17:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
So this is your key argument -- that Brecher isn't notable and that the eXile cannot be cited to show what is has published because it is "fascist." I think the other editors here will agree that these issues are better settled at Gary Brecher and the eXile (where this anon ip has unsuccesfully tried to remove content and nominate for deletion), and that so long as the Brecher article reflects the fact he has written about fresno, this belongs in the media coverage section here as an uncontrovertial and easily verified fact. If you insist in keeping up this laughable non-argument, we can have a consensus vote as to whether your allegations of "newspaper fascism" are at all relevant. If other users are curious why this anon ip is so vehemently against this inclusion I can explain, but I think the arguments here speak pretty well for themselves. Dsol 17:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
The sole arguement is that there is no reputable source on "Brecher" his alleged Fresno residence, or his "media coverage." That being the case, you are violating one of the three most important rules of Wikipedia WP:Verifiability. Stop delaying. Give a reputable source. Put up or shut up. 82.141.187.170 18:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Do not edit my comments, those links are relevant to the subject matter and are not "linkspam." Brecher's articles about Fresno are media coverage of Fresno. You can read them to verify this. Please do not tell me to shut up, that is rude. Dsol 18:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Linkspam seems to be your entire point here. You don't think that it's rude to try to weasel out a dozen times from following the basic rules of Wikipedia and avoiding answering a direct question? Where is there a reputable source showing that "Gary Brecher" is a notable resident of Fresno or provides Fresno with media coverage. Stop the BS. 82.141.187.170 18:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I agreed to take him out of the list of notable residents because of your concerns about the verification of this fact. The fact that he covers Fresno in his columns (print and online media) is verified by his columns, which are a perfectly reputable source on this issue. Therefore listing his column under media coverage of Fresno is perfectly in line with PW policy. If you don't think so, we can have consensus votes. Please do not tell me to "stop the BS" or resort to personal attacks. Dsol 18:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't see how this is exactly linkspam. Linkspam would be linking to a commercial site of his, or putting him on every conceivable page (e.g. war, nerd, etc.). If Kathryn Janeway is on the list for Bloomington, Indiana, I don't see why this is such a problem. Judging by comments made by the anonymous user, it seems that there's some sort of vendetta against Brecher or his publication. Eh; take it elsewhere. --Mgreenbe 18:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

One simple basic rule - everything must be verifiable from a reputable source. DSOL claims that the Fascist "newspaper" is reputable. Total nonsense - look at the pornographic cover mocking the 9/11 victims, consider the unwavering support of, and participation of the National Boleshevik Party in the "newspaper." But just read what the editor of the "newspaper" says in his article "Democracy Sucks"
“we'd be sued out of existence within a few weeks of appearing in any Western democracy, but here in Russia, in the so-called kleptocracy, the power elite has been too busy stealing and killing to give a fuck about us, allowing us to fly around the capital beneath their radar, like a cruise missile. A real democracy would never let us get off the ground.”

It doesn't even pretend to be reputable and is not a reputable source for anything. There's no point in discussing this. Come up with a reputable source or forget about putting anything on this page.82.141.187.170 19:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Reputable citation. I don't see how the quote is relevant. --Mgreenbe 20:28, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the blogger below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was that you can't vote on verification policy. - brenneman{T}{L} 21:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Calling for consensus votes on inclusion of Brecher in "media coverage"

82.141.187.170, since you are the only one here who has come out against any reference to Brecher here, and said that his articles cannot be cited to show what he has published, and since you have just said above that "there is no point in discussing this," I am now calling for consensus votes, as to whether Brecher's writing about Fresno can be noted in a "media coverage" section here, and whether the eXile is a reputable source for verifying what its authors' have published. Please vote below. Dsol 19:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

For inclusion

For exclusion

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I'm holding off voting until everyone agrees to be bound; I'll assume Dsol and Urthogie have already agreed as much. --Mgreenbe 20:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The above "closing" is a bit tongue in cheek and a bit serious reminder. Despite the disputing editor's slightly agressive tone, his concerns are valid and cannot be "voted" away. The same verification concerns would still hold in a "media coverage" section. The terms of undue weight mean than unless Brecher is already known as covering Fresno and multiple reputable media sources document it, including it in the article is still in question. This can be resolved by discussion to examine the issues and validity of sources but not by a vote. - brenneman{T}{L} 21:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
ha, ha, yes, very funny indeed. Of course this was not meant as a vote on whether to use the verification policy, but on how. I don't see how any better verification could be found than the articles themselves. Since the anon ip had said there is no point in discussing further, it seemed natural to vote. We are splitting hairs here for POV reasons. Certainly Brecher himself passes notability requirements, and certainly he verifiably writes a good deal about Fresno. I would also note the "Make omissions explicit" policy. Do you have an opinion Aaron? Dsol 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I should also add that a single, noncontrovertial fact such as X writes about Y shouldn't necessarily require multiple reputable media sources, so far as WP:V is concerned. Not to put too fine a point on it :) Dsol 22:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Re WP:V - Putting on the "common sense" hat I'm struggling to see why someone would pretend to be from Fresno. *shudder* However, we can never use references to refer to themselves oddly. It's partly because the word "verification" has a specific and counter-intuitive meaning. So even if we read his blog and it's all about fresno that doesn't work (seemingly bizarrely) to "verify" that he writes about fresno. We're a tertiary source, someone else has to say he writes about fresno.
  • Re WP:NPOV - This is where the "multiple" comes into it. We have an obligation not just to present facts, but to present them in an unbiased manner. Is Brecher just some crank who rabbits on and got one mention on a slow news day, or is he a commonly spoken of voice of the man in the street in fresno? If we include Brecher in the "media coverage" list than we're meant to include other (are at least a selection) of others who cover Fresno at the same level. I still cannot get the upi link to work, do we have any other external mentions of the blog at all?
  • Re Pain in the arse - This is actually the level of accuracy that we should strive for at all times. It's a pain, and should be handled as disspassionately as possible, but we can't compromise of wp:npov and wp:v. If anyone thinks this is a hard slog, try infantilism to see the epic struggles over sources! And once someone, even one person, calls something into question we can no longer call it "uncontroversial". If this guy wrote about poodle grooming or something we wouldn't be having this discussion!
    brenneman{T}{L} 22:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Try Sailer's website; I'm not really sure how many papers picked up the story and really am not invested enough in this to find out. The fact that he (already considered notable) claims residence of Fresno, and discusses his Fresno life very frequently is an interesting fact (he seems to see Fresno as epitomizing or at least representing non-cosmopolitan American life) which is notable by association. Since the statement is so hard to verify, I see nothing wrong with doing what is done with fictional characters on these lists: short qualification.
  • Gary Brecher - Columnist (possible pseudonym alleging residence)
I see nothing wrong with that. No undue detail, just an appropriate mention that quickly shows the difficulty of verification. Cf. Kathryn Janeway at Bloomington, Indiana. Oh, and someone should clear out the nightclub owners and mortgage initiators, so we can make more room for possibly fictional people. :) --Mgreenbe 23:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

First note all the linkspam above.

Second note that they've completely given up on showing that "Brecher" lives in Fresno. This reason is that they can't. The single article cited above is an e-mail interview that directly questions "Brecher's" existence, and (surprise, surprise) doesn't get an answer.

Third note that this "media coverage" stuff is just an end-run. Thye can't show that "Brecher" exists so they try to show that he writes about Fresno, but they can only take "his" word on this that it actually is about Fresno.

Let's not be coy about this. "Brecher" is the invention of two guys who write a verifiably Fascist English-language giveaway "newspaper" in Moscow. Neither of these guys has any verifiable connection with Fresno. "Brecher" writes amazingly juvenile stuff something like "India and Pakistan are pussies 'cause they don't nuke each other." When he gets tired of this he writes insults about Fresno, e.g. "If you elite media guys lived in places like Fresno you'd see fast how just plain dumb most Americans are." This is written from Moscow, not Fresno.

It strikes me that including this "Brecher" in an article about Fresno would be like including a guy who prints pollock jokes on toilet paper in an article about Poland.

Let's see something verifiable with a reputable source. 82.141.187.170 11:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Here's the thing. His claim is verifiable, even if his living there isn't. Also, his opinion of Fresno is irrelevant to his inclusion.--Urthogie 11:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
"Third note that this "media coverage" stuff is just an end-run. Thye can't show that "Brecher" exists so they try to show that he writes about Fresno, but they can only take "his" word on this that it actually is about Fresno." -- That doesn't even slightly make sense. Dsol 20:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Anon: you don't seem to understand what a primary source is. We're not taking his word, we're taking the document's word. The document is evidence that he claimed it. I suggest you read the pages on primary sources secondary sources and the relevant wikipedia policies.--Urthogie 21:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


The relevant Wikipedia policy is No Original Research WP:OR extracts follow:

"In order to avoid doing original research, and in order to help improve the quality of Wikipedia articles, it is essential that any primary-source material, as well as any generalization, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, or evaluation of information or data, has been published by a reputable third-party publication (that is, not self-published) that is available to readers either from a website (other than Wikipedia) or through a public library. ...

"Why do we exclude original research?

The original motivation for the no original research policy was to combat a real issue: people with personal theories that very few people take seriously, such as cranks and trolls, would attempt to use Wikipedia to draw attention to these theories and to themselves. It is clear that this material does not belong at Wikipedia, but it's difficult to exclude it under other policies: often the cranks will cite their own irreputable publications,..."

82.141.187.170 08:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

This policy is completely irrelevant in this situation, as there is no research involved. Its a fact about a notable (despite being likely fictional) character. Do you have any other concerns with his inclusion?--Urthogie 11:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Inclusion of Brecher

So looking at the above after taking a break from this, I would propose the following version:

"Gary Brecher, byline of the War Nerd column, has claimed to be from Fresno."

The only fact being put forward here is that the claim was made, not that the claim was true. Thus for WP:V and WP:NOR, we only need a reputable secondary source verifying that Brecher has claimed to be from Fresno, not that he really is from Fresno. This source is the Steve Sailor interview published in UPI and linked above. In addition, we have Brecher's own columns as a primary source.

I will listen for comments for a brief while before making the change. I note that so far Mgreenbe, Urthogie, Ryan Utt, Will Beback, and myself have all expressed the opinion that WP:V is satisfied in this case. The anon ip posting above has not, and as for Aaron Brenneman I'm not sure. While no vote can trump WP:V, the consensus (71 or 83% depending on Aaron) is clearly toward the opinion that WP:V is satisfied here. Dsol 19:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

That seems to cover all the bases. Good word-smithing. -Will Beback 06:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Aye. That would straddle the subtle (but correct) point raised in the section above regarding original research. Not to be a pain in the bum, but now we have to fall back on bias. WP:V is, you may note, not one of the five pillars, but neutral point of view is. It is possible to satisfy the former but not the latter.
  • I mentioned this briefly above, but we also have to examine how important a "writer about freso" Brecher is. We tend not to give much "ink" to fringe writers full stop, and if we put one in we're bound to ensure that we're giving "equal voice" to others at the same level. A single write up by itself is thin, but I'm not (at this stage) motivated enough to go looking for other blogs that we might be ignoring.
  • I'd again note that I beleive that if the brecher parent article were nominated for AfD it would be deleted. I also have now looked at the history of the parent article, and it appears to me that this is actually just an old battle being carried onto new grounds.
  • Brecher should be removed from the "fresnoan" category, regardless. Categories are binary, and we don't have enough evidence here to satisfy that.
Also, I appreciate that everyone seems to have taken a step back and been a bit more calm. Biscuits all around.
brenneman{T}{L} 11:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Until Brecher is voted for deletion, he is to be considered notable. Brenneman, if you think he isn't notable, please have faith in the Wikipedia community and put him up for Vote for deletion.--Urthogie 11:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Glad we are moving toward consensus on this. Aaron, you're right that this is an old and extremely stupid battle being carried onto new grounds, but I was neither the first to insert Brecher here nor was I the one who started reverting. Perhaps you are right that Brecher shouldn't be a "fresnoan", perhaps not, but let's settle his inclusion here first.
  • First and most importantly I repeat that Brecher does not have a blog. He has been published in print for several years in a publication with >5k readers. The fact that his publication mirrors his stuff online is useful for citations, but not immediately relevant to his notability as a writer in general.
  • The mention of him I propose above does not emphasize his writings about Fresno. He is noted only for being a notable writer who claims to be from Fresno.
  • NPOV seems totally irrelevant here: there are no conflicting views to neutrally represent, only a question of what to include. I know of no seperate criteria for notability besides the one for inclusion of articles, and Brecher passes the notability criteria for writers in print.
  • Consider the many precedents of fictional characters etc.
While I disagree with you, I appreciate the way you ended the edit war here and raised the level of discussion. Dsol 16:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Sailor shows Brecher NOT a Fresnan

The Sailor article referred to does mention that Brecher is from Fresno, and then contradicts itself by questioning whether Brecher is real and from Fresno. The answer given in Sailor's e-mail interview is revealing "Brecher" DOES not respond that he is real, he does not respond that he's from Fresno. He does respond that he typifies millions of Americans, i.e. he is a stereotype. Clearly the most direct reading of the answer is that he is not real and not from Fresno.

"Q. Who are you? Are you really a fat guy in Fresno who works in data entry and lives in a duplex and can't stand the heat, or is that a literary character you made up?

A. I'm the normal one here. I'm a typical American and you won't see it. Here, do this, get a list of all the men in your company who don't get to go to cool places and write stories and pick 10 or so of them just at random and you will see they're all like me, exactly like me.

The only difference is I met this Mark Ames guy (the editor of The exile) and he thought it would be a funny idea to give me this column. So I can talk and people read it, but there are maybe 50 million guys like me out there, just like me, and you won't see it.

All of us are fat, everybody who isn't "a somebody" in America is fat, but you never let any of them on TV or The New York Times so it's like we don't exist.

This is the dumbest question because it's just like that stupid Kristof quote, it just PROVES YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE WHAT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, which is millions of guys like me waiting for the heart attack."

It might also be important to note that Sailor's story is not a news story in any way but a type of commentary. In fact it is possible (but not likely) that Sailor himself writes the "Brecher" stuff. They certainly share the same political and racial biases. From Sailor's Wikipedia article

"Steve Sailer (born December 4, 1958) is a reporter, movie critic for The American Conservative, VDARE.com columnist, and founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute (1999).

Sailer writes about IQ, genetics, race, gender, politics (including immigration), and sports. ... Sailer frequently calls for a more open and fact-based debate regarding intelligence, genetics, race, and gender.[2] Critics often criticize his dealing with race and intelligence."

82.141.187.170 18:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

This is all totally irrelevant to the version being discussed above. The UPI interview doesn't show anything conclusively, that's why I proposed the version above. If you read the italics below the interview on the UPI website, however, you can see that Sailer himself does believe that Brecher is who he says he is. BTW it's not necessary to copy paste large blocks of text onto talk page when you can just link. As for your OR speculation about "political and racial biases," well, as many have said here already, that belongs on talk:Gary Brecher if anywhere. Dsol 18:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
User:82.141.187.170, if you read Dsol's suggested version, it doesn't say that he is from Fresno, it says he claims to be from it.--Urthogie 19:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The suggestion to put in "Gary Brecher, byline of the War Nerd column, has claimed to be from Fresno," has at least 2 major problems.

1. Where would it possibly go in the article? There is no section "Fictional characters claiming to be from Fresno," nor should there be! It all comes down to the issue of importance. Why is this claim at all important to an article about Fresno?

2. The fact is that there is NO record of a claim by "Brecher" in a reputable source of being from Fresno. "Brecher's" own writings are clearly NOT a reputable source and in Sailor's article Sailor states that he is, but then contradicts himself by asking "Brecher" whether he is from Fresno, in response to which "Brecher" DOES NOT claim to be from Fresno.

BTW, I have NOT done any extensive editing on the "Gary Brecher" article, perhaps 3-4 edits asking that phoney photos be removed (as they eventually were by administrators) for copyright reasons. I've also asked that the "War Nerd" logo be removed because it violates Coca-Cola's trademark rights.

The reason that I don't edit "Gary Brecher," though it is obviously POV, vanity, and unverifiable, is that there are a group of editors who simply attack anybody outside their group for making any changes in that article. I think we have probably set a record here for the amount of space taken up in discussing a 1 line deletion for an unverified claim.

But if anybody were to wonder into "Gary Brecher" and make any changes, I'm sure the response would be 10 times as nasty and time consuming. I'm making a stand here because I don't want these editors bringing out their nonsense into "real world" articles, and because I think there are Fresnans and others who will read this page and not put up with their intimidation.

I have tried to edit other articles in a series of articles related to "Brecher," e.g. "National Bolshevik Party" "Eduard Limonov" "Mark Ames" "Matt Taibbi" and most importantly "the eXile," mostly in order to get personal attacks and blatent lies removed from the articles. These articles are all written by and edited by the same set of editors, and their editing style all seem to use the same techniques of intimidation (just look above for several examples).

You say "1. Where would it possibly go in the article? There is no section "Fictional characters claiming to be from Fresno," nor should there be! It all comes down to the issue of importance. Why is this claim at all important to an article about Fresno?" If it has not been verified where a notable person is from, then they cannot be called fictional. Do you have any other concerns, anon, before we put this into the article?--Urthogie 19:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
First of all note that many place articles can and do include finctional characters, but as Urthogie correctly notes Breecher has not been shown to be fictional. We have had consensus for some time now. The lone objections of this anon ip do not even make sense, and when people are unconvinced by its specious arguments it puts forth it resorts to a bizarre POV harangue about "making a stand" against a dark conspiracy of editors who do not share its laughable POV. I am reverting now, as there is a clear consensus and the anon ip is no longer adressing the proposal in any coherent way. Dsol 14:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

500 lines of arguement and still no reputable source

Sorry, but putting this garbage back in is unacceptable. There's still no reputable source given, there's still nothing that says that he's notable, there's nothing that says that he's a military writer, there's nothing that says he's from Fresno, and there's nothing that says he exists. Your score is 0 out of 5. 82.141.187.170 15:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

You have gone on and on forever and consensus is clearly against you, because what you are saying is without merit. If he's not notable, AfD his page. He doesn't have to exist to be included, as fictional characters are ok too. The quote didn't claim that he was from Fresno, so that's irrelevant. Abide by consenus. Dsol 16:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

"There's still no reputable source given." There is no research required for a statement of fact about a primary source.

"There's nothing that says he is a military writer" His writings are all military oriented.

Indeed, consensus has been reached, even if some users operate outside of policy.--Urthogie 16:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I provided a source[4] of a newspaper which goes out and says before the interview that hes from Fresno. Any argument over his inclusion should now be, beyond a reasonable doubt, pointless and disruptive.--Urthogie 16:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
It's rather amazing that you'd provide this source. "Brecher" (via e-mail) is asked directly if he's real and from Fresno. "He" doesn't answer the question. And this is in a "humorous commentary" article, not in a news article. It's clearly not a source for anything about "Brecher."
And you are still avoiding the question of notability. What possible relevance to the Fresno article could there be in a literal nobody claiming to be from Fresno? 82.141.187.170 17:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Where does it say "humorous commentary" on the Sailor interview? Brecher might or might not be from Fresno, but fictional characters can be included. If he's not notable nominate him for AfD, and if you can't do that he is notable and belongs here. Consensus is quite clear on the issue of relevance, so abide by it and stop wasting everyone's time. Dsol 17:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

"The question of exactly who the War Nerd is remains open. The picture he uses is of an amateur musician in Norway. I've gone through a lot of theories, but at this point I'm back to believing he is pretty much who he says he is, with some details changed to protect his privacy. " from the infamous Sailer article (the version on his website). Sailer's "beliefs" are not relevant and are not verifiable. It's clear that he is not presenting anything about facts here. BTW the commentary nature of the article is shown on the UPI site at the heading "United Press International (P)" the P is for "Perspectives" rather than being part of the newswire. 82.141.187.170 12:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

We don't need the news wire to verify it because we're not saying he is Brecher. We're just proving that he claims it.--Urthogie 13:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Bill the Mortgage guy

OK, I'll take the bait. Is Bill Nijjer really a notable Fresnan? If so there should be some sort of reference, citation, etc. possible. I have no objection to putting Bill back in, if he's real, notable and a Fresnan (and can provide a citation).

I did do a little research - Nijjer seems to be a fully respectable Sikh name. But Bill Nijjer is not to be found by googling except here and related pages. Maybe I should have tried William. In any case an outstanding mortgage originator probably deserves recognition somewhere (just not here unless he can provide a citation).

Cynthia Sterling

Deleted City coucilwoman.Owning a funeral home does not make one a business leader.Seems it would only make sense if entire city council were listed as notable.Entire council is already listed above, so special mention of one member seems pointless.California12 21:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Red Lantern Bar and Bar Owner

I'm almost hesitant to do this because I'm afraid it will be viewed as bias.But this is not a business directory.The Red Lantern is not the only bar in Fresno,it's not the only gay bar either.At first I thought perhaps it was placed here by a patron who really liked their favorite hangout.Then I noticed a name I did not recognize under notable residents Mr. Wigley.After doing a quick search I found he owns the bar.Wikipedia is not the proper place to promote a business.I have honestly never seen an encyclopedia that listed bars under city entrys.I'm really tempted to remove all the store and restaurant names from the shopping areas too.

I agree. All the shopping nonsense should be removed. Could you imagine what an article for San Francisco or Chicago would look like if it included every bar or clothing store? Uucp 16:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes to the Red Lantern comment. Store and restaurant names have no place here, unless they are of cultural significance. Harrods in London has cultural significance. Chain outlets in Fresno do not. This entire article needs to be purged of promotional-commercial tone. The neighborhoods sections also read as promotional copy, unsuitable for an encyclopedia entry. They should be boiled down to one section or moved to a separate, subordinate article with a link from here. Another option would be to cut them entirely. This should be an informative entry about the city, but not a Chamber of Commerce tour. What say?Dphen 15:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
It seems odd that we go into so much detail about the shopping centers of Freno. Several even have articles, in which case they should simply be listed here. -Will Beback 22:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Those shopping areas may not have any cultural significance, but thats where most of the people are (not at museums, sorry). —Preceding unsigned comment added by X & Y (talk • contribs)

It doesn't matter. There are sites out there that are intended for collecting that kind of information. Wikipedia isn't one of them. Sxeptomaniac 16:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Clovis

Is a separate in corporated city.With it's own city government.Why is it here? The non-existent crime is not exactly true they do have crime, maybe not as much as Fresno but it is there.California12 23:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


With regard to Notable residents, a suggestion: Instead of adding names to the list, Wikipedia users should first gather the thoroughly sourced information to write an entry about the individual. Then, once there is in Wikipedia a biographical entry for whoever it is, add the link from Fresno "Notable residents." The way it has been done lately, I see additions of names that I do not recognize, with no link to explain why the individual is notable. Let's put first things first. Thanks. Dphen 15:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Just a note

That the issue of self-reference and sources is being adressed at the talk page of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Things may not move quickly sometimes, but there is movement none the less. - brenneman{T}{L} 05:15, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Major Cleanup, March 2006

I removed all the discussion of shopping malls, and much of the detail about Fresno neighborhoods. Too much of it read like the ravings of a semiliterate real estate agent. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, let's maintain this article as appropriate for one. Uucp 18:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I did some further editing of the neighborhoods section. I agree that this doesn't need to be some real estate agent's list of Fresno's selling points. I tried to make it flow a bit better and took care of a few remaining errors. I am thinking that it might be worth removing all but the sections on Sunnyside, Downtown, the Tower District, Fig Garden, and possibly Woodward Park. Those have some historical significance, but I don't see any particular reason to single out the other neighborhoods. Thoughts? Sxeptomaniac 00:27, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks to both editors for using the red pencil and really editing. The article needed it. Cheers, -Will Beback 00:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Please ditch Woodward Area (not park), it was scrub brush and a drive-in until about 15 years ago.

It may have been nothing till 15 years ago, but it IS something now. In case you've missed it, The Riverpark/Woodward Park Area (whatever you want to call it) is STACKED with homes and commerical development, yet it, somehow, is not a "neighborhood" by your definition? What, must it come of age 30 years before you will recognize it?

World War II

This needs slight revision. 1. It gives the impression that the war ended the ethnic neighborhoods, when in truth it was time and progress that caused their decline.As people learned to speak English they assimilated and moved out into the general population.This is a pattern that was repeated across the U.S.Did it really have anything to do with the war? 2."Fresno rounded up the Japanese" It should be clarified that this wasn't just a Fresno specific operation.It was the Feds who were "rounding up" (can we get rid of that phrase?)and Fresno was just a part of a much larger operation. 3:Germans and Italians Can anyone find a source for this, that says it happened in Fresno? If so did the City of Fresno and School District really order it? Or turn a blind eye? Or did some people in the city just do it around town and in the schools and it wasn't official? If it can be sourced it belongs here, but if not it really should go.I can find numerous links about the Japanese Internment Operation in Fresno, but nothing about Germans and Italians.California12 18:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok I removed the German and Italian portion until someone can source it. California12 19:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

West Fresno

Needs a rewrite As is It's a constant target for racist vandalism and ridiculous remarks.This is because of the way it's written.The writer mentions only the African American population and crime.It's borderline as it is.The "NOTED" remark is a bit much. California12 18:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any reason why West Fresno needs to be included at all. It's not a truly distinct neighborhood like the others, and doesn't have any real historical or cultural significance. I just took the liberty of removing it altogether. Sxeptomaniac 19:47, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Would some info on the Kearney Blvd Area be good enough to include? There is some notable history about it...and the large concentration of African-Americans (compared to the rest of Fresno) is notable.X & Y 21:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Operation Rezone

I added a couple of lines on Operation Rezone to the history section, but I've been having trouble finding much detail on it. Hopefully someone can help flesh that out a bit. Sxeptomaniac 21:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Isn't opera singer Ann Whitehurst from Fresno?

Can't seem to find this, but I was thinking that she was?California12 19:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 

    Yes, if it is the same, she is here. Try Ann Sullivan Whitehurst.

Kopi

Normally I would not consider local news people to be under notable (no offense meant) but since this one has an imdb profile. Would he qualify ? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0815462/ California12 19:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

I remember hearing before that he'd done a number of bit parts in movies over the years, so maybe he should be added. Sxeptomaniac 20:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Racial Vandalism

Regular event now ? Whatever the case it's not funny. California12 19:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, people in Fresno often generalize about certain sections of town, particularly the West. I think it's connected to the concentrated pockets of poverty referred to in the 2005 article. I believe our vandals actually think they are providing helpful information by spreading their prejudice. Sxeptomaniac 20:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know if this is what you're referring to, but the demographic statistics seem to be wrong. The sum total percentages of all the races add up to more than 100% and I don't see any citations.--Hraefen Talk 15:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Mouseketeer?

Wikipedia entry for Mickey Mouse Club makes no mention of a James O'Connor. No Jim or Jimmy O'Connor either. There is mention of head Mouseketeer Jimmie Dodd. Wikipedia has several pages for people named James O'Connor but none of them seem to be this James O'Connor. Perhaps James O'Connor should be left off the list of prominent Fresnans until his existence and career can be substantiated.216.165.147.26 16:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that. I've found a couple of entries myself of "notables" that were either exaggerated, mistaken, or made up.
On another note, I noticed someone put a citation needed tag next to "Pop" Laval's entry. There isn't much biographical information for him online, but I do want to create an article for him, so I will be able to cite it once I can find a biography for him. Sxeptomaniac 19:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

After a couple of Google searches, in which no reference to that James O'Connor could be found, I removed him. Sxeptomaniac 20:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Fresno Creek

Origins and history section says Fresno was named after Fresno County, which in turn was named after Fresno Creek. But where is Fresno Creek? Did it flow into the San Joaquin where Millerton Lake is now? Or is Fresno Creek the same as the Fresno River (seasonally dry)? UC Libraries website Counting California [5] suggests Fresno Creek and Fresno Riveer names were interchangeable. Can anyone recommend another authoritative source? Thanks. Dphen 15:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

This is what I saw on the wikipedia page for Fresno County: Fresno was actually named after two particular ash trees that grew near the town of Minkler on the Kings River. One of the trees is still alive and standing. X & Y 20:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

For a brief time, I worked for the USBR at Friant Dam. I recall visiting a very small and completely dry creek bed on the Madera side of the SJR that I believe was called Fresno Creek. This was a few years ago, so I may be confused. -Anþony 10:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

CA-99 and Interstate 7/9?

This article says that CA Hwy 99 may eventually become Interstate 9; however, the Bakersfield article speculates that it will become Interstate 7. Who's right? cluth 01:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I think the key here is "speculates", neither is right quite yet, until the speculation changes to reality. Both are possible, nothing is official.

Google gives 84 hits for fresno "interstate 7" -wikipedia and 145 for fresno "interstate 9" -wikipedia . dml 02:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Economy changes

This section focused on the economy of the County and not on the City. I revised it to reflect a more appropriate emphasis. Also corrected some inaccuracies, e.g., PR Farms is in Clovis and not Fresno.

Woodward Park

This sounds like a resident expounding a political agenda to distance themself from the stigma which Fresno suffers. Woodward Park, 'the park' is one significant attribute, Woodward park 'area,' commercial and residential development was nothing more than a scrub brush and a drive-in 15 years ago.

It may have been nothing till 15 years ago, but it IS something now. The Riverpark/Woodward Park Area (whatever you want to call it) is STACKED with homes and commerical development, yet it, somehow, is not a "neighborhood" by your definition? What, must it come of age 30 years before you will recognize it?

List of notable residents of Fresno

Please alphabetize

I removed two entries that had been tacked onto the end of alphabetized list of notables. Neither (see below) linked to anything, and neither contained info explaining why name belonged. Hooray for the US Navy and all, but there isn't justification for including all active duty personnel and veterans in this list. If there are citations available to justify inclusion, please list them. "Worthy of mention" means nothing. Also, if these names are added back to notables, please insert them into list in alphabetical order, based on last name. Thanks.

Daphodyl 18:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Good catch. This isn't the first time we've had "notables" that just aren't. I've deleted a number of them myself. Personally, I wouldn't mind just getting rid of the list altogether (most lists on Wikipedia seem to be a target for POV wars and vandalism), but I'm sure there are those that lean towards keeping it, and I don't have the time to make it a cause. I'd prefer to just categorize the articles as people from Fresno and link to the category at the bottom of the page. Sxeptomaniac 20:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Konrad Miller

I just undid the entry "Konrad Miller Professional ballroom dancer" after finding no Google hits for that name associated with Fresno except this one, from CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Student Voice Workshop, May 24, 2006, which I found amusing, but still not notable enough:

"...and Konrad Miller, Buchanan High School students, addressed the Board as to why the District should change Woodshop from an elective class to a Fine Arts requirement." --Hjal 18:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Climate

Just thought I would point out that under climate it states that fresno has realatively cold winters. That is a point of opinion over fact isn't it? Is it realatively cold compared to new york, texas, florida? I think someone on alaska would laugh at that! Also, it gives the avg low for winter compared to the avg high in summer. Isn't that missleading? I mean really, an avg high in summer is something between 50 and 65, really not all that cold. I suggest that the opinion be removed and either both high and lows for both be shown, or just show the highs etc... —Preceding unsigned comment added by MWJamesLDS (talk • contribs)

I'd seen that change a little while back and had forgotten to go back and fix it. It was originally "mild" and I just changed it back. Thanks for catching it. Sxeptomaniac 21:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

If Tehachapi has a popular culture section, why not Fresno? (Come on, be brave!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.64.178 (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not terribly fond of "in popular culture" sections. They just tend to be junk piles of every obscure reference ever made, and not remotely useful. I don't generally remove them, but I don't create or add to them, because they're just a waste of time. Sχeptomaniacχαιρετε 00:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fresno,_California/Archive_1&oldid=1143732385"