Talk:Lapidary

Gemology and Jewelry: Lapidary Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lapidary subpage.

Craft High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Comments

I've made some additions y'all may like, but I've changed some statements about the term "lapidary" that I think don't agree with good dictionaries. Page History will reveal my meddling. The arts of a sculptor or stone-mason are generally too broad in scale to fall within the definition, is the main change I've made. Mount Rushmore may be stonework, I thought, but it's not really lapidary. Wetman 19:29, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I made some spelling and other minor changes and added information about the Tucson Gem and Mineral Society Show in Arizona. 4 Oct 2005. Rick Dalrymple rockshop@rocks4u.com www.rocks4u.com

LapidaryNews.com appears to be a dead hypertext link as of this time. It wasn't on the AOL search engine. Maybe their server is just down. So, I won't take the liberty of deleting it until it is checked and certified as being out of service on a permanent basis. T.E. Goodwin 05:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added 3 dictionary links and incorporated some of those extra meanings, and "lapidarist" into the first paragraph. I also attempted to clarify. Needs more cleanup. The arcane term/topic: "Hardstone carving" prolly shouldn't be there, (in a lede section or quasi-stub) —except for talk of a merger. Also I think it wrongly describes-emphasizes a lapidarist as a stone cutter when in fact he is typically an object creator (such as jewelry).
--68.127.92.191 (talk) 09:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Hardstone carving is now the standard museum term for many of the larger objects produced, including ones that count as jewellery. The term lapidarist seems inescapably somewhat vague, & is probably just as arcane to those without an interest in the subject. I have modified the text slightly. Johnbod (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki conflict

The Hungarian interwiki link (hu:Lapidárium) has a different meaning (a "museum" for stones). The other languages should be checked, and the interwiki graph shold be split in two. --Tgr 11:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Lapidary Machine

I placed information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapidary_machine that may be deleted. If anyone is interested in merging it (prior to deletion), that would be wonderful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twillisjr (talk • contribs) 04:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merged with hardstone carving ??

Quote: "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Hardstone carving."

Disagree, "hardstone carving" is not about the verb; "carving," aka lapidary. I started in "hardstone carving," and was frustrated, it seemed off topic. And I've never heard that term before, so I presume it's jargon (of historians?). see also: http://www.yourdictionary.com/lapidary
--68.127.92.191 (talk) 08:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Also oppose this merge proposal, which has not been set up properly, with nothing at Hardstone carving. I think the article explains adequately why this is a wider term. I think it can now be removed after 3 months with only 2 opposes. Johnbod (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Merge Gemcutter into Lapidary. The two are used as synonyms, and the Gemcutter is a long-standing unreferenced article. Any distinctions between the terms can be discussed on the one page. Klbrain (talk) 13:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ARTH 212-01 Medieval European Art

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2024 and 12 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PRGR02 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Teague W. Sullivan.

— Assignment last updated by Chark0206 (talk) 20:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]