Talk:Erbium
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Sources that could be useful to experts
[edit]I don't have the knowledge to include the following references in this article but they could be useful:
- Anisotropic polarizability of erbium atoms
- Bose-Einstein Condensation of Erbium
- Few-Mode Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: A Review
- On‐Chip Integrated Waveguide Amplifiers on Erbium‐Doped Thin‐Film Lithium Niobate on Insulator
- ISBN 9789201032218 Alternative Radionuclide Production with a Cyclotron
Plus some that look a little more readable:
- Efficacy, safety, and guidelines of application of the fractional ablative laser erbium YAG 2940 nm and non-ablative laser erbium glass in rejuvenation, skin spots, and acne in different skin phototypes: a systematic review
- The role of Cerium, Europium and Erbium doped TiO2 photocatalysts in water treatment: A mini-review
- Rare earth elements: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, analysis, recycling, and environmental impact
- Exposure, metabolism, and toxicity of rare earths and related compounds
Reconrabbit 20:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Great! The Hirano/Suzuki paper lead me to look at Rare-earth element. WoW! what a mess. The On human health section was completely, 100% wrong. Decent references but every one was misrepresented. You might consider taking a look at that article. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Image
[edit]When was the info box image changed and why 2603:8080:D03:89D4:78F9:3A7C:D9A2:F709 (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)