Jump to content

Talk:Joshua Reynolds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Yes, a lot of his stuff is in Saltram House; he is in fact a proper Janner. I'll fill this out a bit when I get the mood (I much prefer stuff like the Newlyn School). sjc

so do I. I find the 18th century portrait a pretty tiresome subject. But if i can exploit localist sentiment to avoid doing work, well, go ahead! --MichaelTinkler

I've Actually Been Told That Im Related to Joshua Reynolds But i do not know Anything About him ,If anyone knows anything else can u tell me! xx (JustMe) Nice try, Michael. Surely someone out there must like Reynolds? sjc


Sorry, I think I may have messed things up in moving everything from "Sir Joshua Reynolds" to "Joshua Reynolds", since there was stuff in the history and Talk page of the former. See:-

and click on "Older versions" to see who said what. -- Oliver PEREIRA 17:41 Dec 2, 2002 (UTC)

comments

[edit]

Why does this article start off calling him the most important painter? Isn't that an opinion?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Arctic sunrise (talkcontribs) 10:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be referenced, but it would be easy to do so. Johnbod (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


It was Sir William Chambers who jointly with Reynolds jointly founded the Royal Academy not Gainsborough. It was agreed that Reynolds as an artist would be a more suitable first President than William Chambers, who was an architect. Chambers who was a good friend of George 111 became the first Treasurer and remained in that office almost until his death in 1796. Selina Innes (Selina innes (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)) July 2013[reply]

Expanding the article

[edit]

This article is a bit of a mess and I believe Sir Joshua deserves a better article than this. However the abundance of unsourced text makes it difficult to add to. I think a lot of it should be deleted and replaced with sourced information. References should not be hard to find.--Britannicus (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to lean heavily in tone on the late 19th c. history/biography. I think it should be cleaned up to remove some of the detail and worked on for tone.Parkwells (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both of you please feel free to go ahead! Johnbod (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:.Fig 1 Sir Joshua Reynolds The Age of Innocence. Painted circa 1788. Frame contemporary with picture. From Houghton, 2005, 24..jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:.Fig 1 Sir Joshua Reynolds The Age of Innocence. Painted circa 1788. Frame contemporary with picture. From Houghton, 2005, 24..jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:.Fig 1 Sir Joshua Reynolds The Age of Innocence. Painted circa 1788. Frame contemporary with picture. From Houghton, 2005, 24..jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

George Montagu-Dunk

[edit]

The painting of George Montagu-Dunk - this reproduction has a pale-greenish shade, compared with the others. Is it possible to remove it and replace with something different? Plenty of good pictures on commons. Lady Frances Finch; James 7th Earl of Lauderdale; Miss Mary Hickey; Lady Sondes; Master Bunbury Hafspajen (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, wait a little more and than change it. Hafspajen (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joshua Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joshua Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joshua Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]