Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acrophony
ACROPHONY was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
Odd dictdef. RickK 23:33, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Comment Borderline. I'm feeling pretty cranky and deletionist these days, for some reason, but I think maybe I'd go so far to say that if this article were well illustrated I'd vote keep. By the way, didn't Kipling write one of his Just So Stories about this? Rats, there's my copy of The Jungle Book but I can never put my hands on the Just So Stories when I need them... Oh well, it's probably quicker to Google for it than to walk upstairs... no wonder I keep gaining weight... yep, How the Alphabet was Made. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:16, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Needs cleanup. — Gwalla | Talk 01:21, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: I've been reading such utter junk on VfD lately that it makes me smile and nod appreciatively in the presence of anything that manages to keep the language whole and not offend logic deliberately. Geogre 01:54, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: jericho4.0 04:02, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: —Michael Z. 17:12, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.