Talk:The History of the Standard Oil Company

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Deletion discussion

Copied from deletion debuate:

~~Delete substub if not expanded quickly -- Cyrius|&#9998 19:20, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)~~
Delete, although this is certainly a subject that should have an article. --Αλεξ Σ 20:13, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Ida Tarbell. It's not an article about Standard Oil, it's an article about Ida Tarbell's book about Standard Oil. Anyone editor can always change it back whenever they have relevant content. I do believe I'm going to make it a redirect now myself. Note: entire content of this page was:

This is a stub of The History of the Standard Oil Company book. A brief summary would go here once a little elbow grease and energy are found.

Dpbsmith 20:46, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Keep Bensaccount 01:51, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep as a redirect. Agreed with Dpbsmith. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:33, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep redirect to book author -- Cyrius|&#9998 19:39, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
Keep as redirect. Cribcage 14:23, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Real book. BL 07:26, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)

Consensus to keep. DJ Clayworth 20:39, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I noticed a discrepancy between this article and the Standard Oil article. In the Standard Oil article, it says Tarbell's work was published in 19 pieces, this article says 17.
- Don't have time to do the research on it now, but figured I'd note it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterfulninja (talk • contribs) 16:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- According to [1], it appears the correct number of parts is 19, so I went ahead and changed the article. - MasterfulNinja —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the article state the book is a "sexualized" example? If nobody protests/sources this I'm removing from the article.Codeofdusk (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, was going to edit here saying it was fixed, but you got to it before me! Thanks!Codeofdusk (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]