Talk:Toronto-Dominion Centre

Skyscrapers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as High-importance).

Spelling

I restored the hyphen in Toronto-Dominion because that's the spelling used on the official site, which is linked to in the article. John FitzGerald 21:50, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Moving to Toronto–Dominion Centre per MOS:NDASH and to maintain consistency with similar article titles. Senator2029 “Talk” 09:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that a dash is correct. This will bring the article in line with how both the TD Centre and architectural journalists write it. Willplayfair (talk) 06:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, the dash is not correct. This is a misinterpretation of MOS:DASH. The applicable advice is Generally, use a hyphen in compounded proper names of single entities. Guinea-Bissau; Bissau is the capital, and this distinguishes the country from neighboring Guinea. Wilkes-Barre, a single city named after two people. This is a single entity (a single bank) named after the two banks that merged. An example of correct usage of the dash would be "the Bank of Toronto–Dominion Bank partnership arrangement" where two independent banks formed an agreement to operate some joint activity together. – wbm1058 (talk) 03:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prince George Hotel

The construction of the TD Centre required the demolition of many buildings. The Prince George hotel was but one of many, and by no stretch the most significant of those demolished. The big loss was the demolition of the beautiful old bank headquarters at Bay and King -- people still talk about that building. If the article is going to refer to the buildings that were lost to make way for the TD Centre, which isn't a bad idea, then it should do so comprehensively, rather than just randomnly refering to one building. I don't believe that we need to refer to every building that was demolished, but I think just saying "The site was occupied by the Prince George Hotel" is hugely misleading. Skeezix1000 12:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Makes sense to me! :) E Pluribus Anthony 15:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, though it would be good to see a detailed description of what was on the site prior to the TD-Centre. - SimonP 22:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Absolutely. Some pretty spectacular buildings were demolished along King Street West to make way for the TD Centre and First Canadian Place. Skeezix1000 22:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Miles van der Rohe

I added it to the Miles van der Rohe buildings category. --24.226.18.177 01:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

I went to the Toronto-Dominon Bank Tower on 66 Wellington Street W during the doors open toronto in May. I was wondering if I could put some of the pictures I took into this article.--Taida 02:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dominion_Centre.jpg

It would be great if you could add some of the images that you took. However, I'm not sure if the one linked would be best placed in this article, as it doesn't show any of the TD Centre. With a little cropping that would be an excellent picture of Metro Hall, and you could also cut out a good image of the CBC Building. - SimonP 13:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto-Dominion Centre

There are so many errors in this article that I cannot start to edit it. I was the assistant to Syd Bregman,the Executive Architect for the project and was intimately involved in the management of the design team. For example, the first stage of the project was the concept of the Bronfman family who retained Bregman & Hamann to do a preliminary study of an office tower on Bay St, not Allen Lambert. When they determined that the property required included the old TD Bank building at the corner of King and Bay they approached Allen Lambert who suggested a joint venture to develop the project. A company was formed, jointly owned by CEMP Investments, the Bronfman family investment arm, and the TD Bank and named the Toronto-Dominion Centre Ltd. I still have copies of the specifications,budgets and contracts for the project.Artell 04:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should improve it if you have the knowledge. That's how this encyclopedia works. It sounds like you could write the book on the T-D Centre. If you do or know of good source material, at least note that here. A.Roz (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consulate-General of Japan photo request

Someone should photograph the Consulate-General of Japan, which is located at Suite 3300 of the Royal Trust Tower. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Wessex-TD.jpg

The image File:Wessex-TD.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Toronto-Dominion Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615051719/http://www.heritagefdn.on.ca/userfiles/page_attachments/Library/1/2112473_TD_Centre_ENG.pdf to http://www.heritagefdn.on.ca/userfiles/page_attachments/Library/1/2112473_TD_Centre_ENG.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst & Young Tower

I seem to recall that at the time the construction of the Ernst & Young Tower was somewhat controversial because some people (architects?) thought it disrupted the blalance (I hesitate to use the word symmetry) created by the original four towers, was not part of the original concept and was obviously an afterthought, and also because of the way it incorporated the TSE building. Does anyone know of contemporary sources for any criticism or debate around the addition of the tower? Alexander's Hood (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Toronto-Dominion Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New sections

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have added information about Oscar Peterson Place, the Gallery of Inuit Art, the Design Exchange, the 50th anniversary exhibit, property branding, the new conference centre, and environmental initiatives. Naturally, I've made some updates to the structure of the article — all with the aim of helping the reader process all the ins and outs of this great design story. Speaking of which, I removed the 'Design' section title that originally contained a few of the individual sections because design really touches on almost all aspects of this story — and so it's now configured so that the theme of design can be woven into the article wherever appropriate.

Willplayfair (talk) 06:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]