Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Cahill

Erin Cahill was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep. Cool Hand Luke 09:00, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) Extremely obvious vanity. No claims of natability. Even though I've seen other examples of Proposed speedy deletion criteria speedied, I dont believe it's proper to do so. If anything, listing them all would encourage an actual change in policy. Cool Hand Luke 10:41, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Reluctantly. She's a babe :P Incidently, Cool Hand Luke did the right thing listing this on VfD. It's not a candidate for speedy deletion. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:13, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I'm basically neutral on this as she's a pretty minor celeb (she was one of the Power Rangers, so it's unlikely to be vanity in the sense of written by Erin herself) BUT it is a copyvio from http://www.will-powered.com/erin/Bio.html Call that a delete new stub fine. Notability questionable. Weak Keep -- GWO 11:22, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
As this is a copyvio, delete. If someone rewrites it, I'll vote keep, however--she's worthy of an article. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:49, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: There are a lot of babes out there. She was a power ranger, so she would be listed in such an article. Until she has more of a career, there's no need to write her up. Geogre 19:33, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Looked at the rewrite, and I've got to say she's a C- list celebrity at this point and more appropriate for an encyclopedia dedicated to every film and TV actor than to a general encyclopedia, so I maintain that she should be mentioned in the Power Rangers article and not separately yet. Geogre 03:32, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Re-wrote stub from scratch. Not an extensive career, but not bad for someone only 24. Weak keep. Niteowlneils 19:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
K Might be a C-list actress, but definitely not a bad start. This is why we should look into vanity claims before marking them for delete. Chris 02:35, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep, now that its not copyvio, seems like a fine start for an article. Also, she's a host of a show on Spike TV. Posiduck 04:11, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Radman1 06:21, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Hardly a major actress, but she's had some notable parts. Gamaliel 07:25, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. She seems to have done quite an extensive range of work.Dr Zen 07:30, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. This article will of course grow once her fans visit WP. --Tmh 10:08, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Power ranger. anthony 警告 14:00, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

LOL :) Thue | talk 18:16, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Keep, she's a power ranger, fer crissakes. Sam [Spade] 19:05, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep now that it's rewritten by Niteowlneils. The original article just recounted her favourite movies. Cool Hand Luke 19:07, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Almost anyone with an IMDB article deserves their own article. Johnleemk | Talk 19:12, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep, as its rewritten. Johnleemk - Aha! so *you're* the B-Move Bandit then! :-pp Kiand 00:53, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Any actor/actress with a recurring role is noteworthy. Fuzheado | Talk 04:51, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep stuff like this, though not particularly scholarly, attracts more editors to our community. That's a good thing, because thay won't stay long if they aren't willing to work... so we get more folk to share the editing chores. (and I detest the Power Rangers)Pedant 18:40, 2004 Oct 28 (UTC)
Keep. It's not hurting anyone. And she's a fairly major player in the action kids world. -- user:zanimum

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.