Talk:Sunshine Policy

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The "Return to the Sunshine Policy: 2017-present" section is highly biased

This section of the article is highly biased and portrays the "Moonshine Policy" as a complete success. It does not mention the fact that North Korea has renegaded on many of the commitments it has made in bilateral relations with both the USA and South Korea. It does not mention that North Korea has made no progress towards nuclear disarmament and ending its ballistic missile program. More generally, it doesn't explain why North Korea was unlikely to change its behavior at all. Numerous analysts have always strongly doubted that North Korea would ever willingly give up its Nuclear Weapons that it has sacrificed so much for. It does not mention that recent North Korean engagement is consistent with its long-term foreign policy strategy of oscillating between periods of increased bellicosity towards South Korea and periods of increased of rapprochement.

In short, the current article would give them impression that North Korea is closer today to being at peace with South Korea, when in reality the "Moonshine Policy" has mostly flopped despite its eye-catching summits and agreements.

File nominated for deletion on commons

The file c:File:Emblem of Korean Courts.svg used in this article has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
Reason: I think time has come to finish the long-forgotten (or ignored) question: Is [Template:M used with invalid code 'tl'. See documentation.]KOGL free?  I doubt its freeness, based on the fact that we do not have definite answer for Template talk:KOGL#Free?. To save your click...  [Template:M used with invalid code 'talkquote'. See documentation.]In case the terms change we (on Wikimedia projects) can still reuse it under the licensing conditions at the time of upload here. But in that case we must stop distributing the file to others because we are not a licensor (only a reuser) and our scope of redistributing entirely relies on the licensing of the source. If the source licensing is not a public license (but a private license contract concluded when the licensee downloads the file from the official source) then it is not free. Its revocable and fails c:Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms.  We, as of 2018, do not have a final answer for this. And this means, we have to delete these images, including some VIs and FPs. 
Deletion request: link

Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

File nominated for deletion on commons

The file c:File:Emblem of the Government of the Republic of Korea.svg used in this article has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
Reason: I think time has come to finish the long-forgotten (or ignored) question: Is [Template:M used with invalid code 'tl'. See documentation.]KOGL free?  I doubt its freeness, based on the fact that we do not have definite answer for Template talk:KOGL#Free?. To save your click...  [Template:M used with invalid code 'talkquote'. See documentation.]In case the terms change we (on Wikimedia projects) can still reuse it under the licensing conditions at the time of upload here. But in that case we must stop distributing the file to others because we are not a licensor (only a reuser) and our scope of redistributing entirely relies on the licensing of the source. If the source licensing is not a public license (but a private license contract concluded when the licensee downloads the file from the official source) then it is not free. Its revocable and fails c:Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms.  We, as of 2018, do not have a final answer for this. And this means, we have to delete these images, including some VIs and FPs. 
Deletion request: link

Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 07:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Orphaned references in Sunshine Policy

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Sunshine Policy's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "april272018":

From Foreign relations of North Korea: Taylor, Adam (27 April 2018). "The full text of North and South Korea's agreement, annotated" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
From North Korea–South Korea relations: Taylor, Adam (27 April 2018). "The full text of North and South Korea's agreement, annotated". Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 4 July 2018 – via www.washingtonpost.com. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

Reference named "june1":

From North Korea–South Korea relations: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/01/rival-koreas-agree-to-military-red-cross-talks-for-peace.html
From May 2018 inter-Korean summit: "Rival Koreas agree to military, Red Cross talks for peace". CNBC. 1 June 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2018.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]