Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emancipism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:41, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Emancipism

One Google hit (and that's a .pdf file). Rick K 06:46, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

Clean up. Iasson 07:18, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- What is there to clean up if this philosophy is nonexistant? RickK 07:21, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
  - Lets give to it some more time before delete it. Iasson 07:29, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    - Non-notability is non-notability. Only one hit in all of the Internet makes this non-notable and original research. RickK 08:51, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
      - Have you tried "Emancipist" google hits? Iasson 09:04, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
        625 Google hits for "emancipist", and it means a "freed convict". And the one Google hit refers to the same thing, judging from the context. No connection with this non-existant "philosophy". Delete. Raven42 10:48, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, for reasons stated above -- Ferkelparade π 13:04, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Unverifiable, neologism. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:10, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete -- DCEdwards1966 16:54, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete --fvw * 17:47, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)
Delete -- Curps 17:51, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete --RoySmith 22:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, original research, neologism. Megan1967 02:00, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. And delete Iasson's comments re: a new voting procedure as well. Jayjg | (Talk) 22:49, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I've deleted it twice, he keeps reinserting it. Rick K 08:11, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.