User talk:2004-12-29T22:45Z

Why do you want your user page speedied? --Golbez 02:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; looking at the history, I see no good edits from others, and your only edits have been to try to get it speedied. Your wish is granted. --Golbez 02:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Velez Sarsfield

Please correct all the redirs before moving the page. I will add a disambiguation note on the page but you just broke all the links to the correct page.

When all the links are corrected, then we should add the disambiguation. (see River Plate for an example of how it should be done)

--Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 19:35, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. As you can see, I did a few myself. I hope I'll be able to continue tomorrow. --Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 23:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tawnee Stone

I have blocked you for 2 weeks for intentionally and knowingly violating established consensus and attempting to publish unverifiable personal details about this woman. I know you are happy to rely on web forums for your gossip, but unless and until you can establish that her real name has been published in an established source (e.g. her professional website, a trade publication, a film credit, IMDB, etc), I will not accept your attempts to use Wikipedia to out her or similarly positioned women.

If you promise to stop doing this, I will remove the block. Dragons flight 02:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:PeterZed

Er, actually I said I wanted to prevent him from "posting increasingly inflammatory messages". [1] will give you an idea of where his messages were heading. Fortunately, he has moderated his tone, and I am confident he will be unblocked soon, even if he and I don't agree on everything. Incidentally, I noticed that your signature does not link to your user page, which I'm assuming is deliberate. I'd like to ask that you consider having at least one character link to your user page or talk page, or perhaps if you don't mind you could let me know why you don't wish to do so? Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Customer acquisition

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 21:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ceradyne

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ceradyne, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Ceradyne. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 15:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Phonetic sound

A tag has been placed on Phonetic sound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 13:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Ascript

Template:Ascript has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:33, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:FOX network shows

I have nominated Category:FOX network shows (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, John Anderson (sportscaster), has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "John Anderson (sportscaster)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 15:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yes you can. Since you had some involvement with the Yes you can redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 05:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matzo ball eating listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matzo ball eating. Since you had some involvement with the Matzo ball eating redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graduating listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Graduating. Since you had some involvement with the Graduating redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lightspeed Media Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightspeed Media Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightspeed Media Corporation (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rfishhook

Template:Rfishhook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 05:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tema:Desencadenando y renovando mucha satisfacción todo el mundo Fer310903@gmail.com individual innovación perfecto my gracias

Es muy buena plataforma saludos paratodos Autor:Fer310903 177.237.8.193 (talk) 06:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Linevert

Template:Linevert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lengthmark

Template:Lengthmark has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Linevertsub

Template:Linevertsub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhotichook

Template:Rhotichook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rturn

Template:Rturn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Epsilon1rev

Template:Epsilon1rev has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Epsilon1revhook

Template:Epsilon1revhook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pipedbl

Template:Pipedbl has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Schwahook

Template:Schwahook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Verticalbardbl

Template:Verticalbardbl has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Epsilon1

Template:Epsilon1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"An American Revolution" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect An American Revolution and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 31#An American Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 03:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PostScript name

Template:PostScript name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:PostScript name template talk pages

A tag has been placed on Category:PostScript name template talk pages indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]