User talk:Sidar

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 01:58, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Esterification

How readily does phenol form esters? Is there any special conditions that are required, like reflux or maybe an acid catalyst? Would it be easier to esterify it to a carboxylic acid than an alcohol? Can the reactant be a catalyst too? I assume it would be easier still to esterify with a diacid like oxalic acid? I assume oxalyl chloride is even faster still. I am trying to make phenyl oxalate ester, what is the best method without steling chemicals from my college lab? Lots of questions :) mastodon 23:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Sidar! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 01:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DPRK nuclear test

Fox news is now saying the seismic test may have indicated the test failed. In other words, I was right and this is simply speculative. There is, as far as I can tell, no reliable source confirming that this was a nuclear test. KazakhPol 03:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Steve Hoffman‎

I suggest you take a look at what I did. I added multiple signatures, and did my best to separate comments by date. Unfortunately, the lack of signatures made it impossible to completely clean up the mess, as editors had already erroneously assumed that comments made almost two years ago were part of this months discussion. --Ronz 21:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Talk:Steve Hoffman

I suggest you remove or rewrite ":@CBM: Thank you for your useless contribution." See WP:TALK and WP:CIVIL. Thanks! --Ronz 19:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Ronz 17:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Current discussions in Talk:Steve Hoffman

Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the discussions in Talk:Steve Hoffman. However, I hope you aren't offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. It's best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not. --Ronz 17:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 21 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Grobschnitt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 01:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Me First.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Me First.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sunsunsun.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunsunsun.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vain glory opera.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vain glory opera.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Toto Hydra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Toto Hydra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hallofflames.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hallofflames.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilman reagent.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gilman reagent.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Evil Minded

I have nominated Evil Minded, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Minded. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Children of Steel

I have nominated Children of Steel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Steel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]