User talk:KVeil

Welcome to Wikipedia! Your articles and edits are very helpful and appropriate; keep up the good work! --Merovingian ↕ Talk 22:35, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)

Australasian College of Health Informatics

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Australasian College of Health Informatics, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.achi.org.au. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

This article has had to be deleted, as the text was copied from that source. I'm afraid from your note at the article's talk page that you may be misunderstanding our copyright policy. Even if the article is about the subject of the website, we can't import text from a copyrighted source without verifying permission. Copyright is presumed, but in this case does not need to be, as the website is clearly marked "©2002-2010 ACHI". You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. You're welcome to create a new article on this subject, but it will need to be rewritten. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic journal of health informatics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Electronic journal of health informatics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 06:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Electronic journal of health informatics

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Electronic journal of health informatics, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

eJHI

Hi there, I was indeed the admin who wielded the axe on this article but I'll be happy to help see if we can't salvage something. The reason I deleted it was because the text in it "The electronic Journal of Health Informatics is dedicated to the advancement of Health Informatics and information technology in healthcare. eJHI is an international Open access journal committed to scholarly excellence and has a global readership in all health professions and at all levels" was identical to the content here. There was really very little else in the article that would have made sense had the text above been removed, so I deleted the article as a whole. What I've done for now is to restore the skeleton of the article (minus that text) to a page in your user space here so you can work on it in peace.

In your email to me you made the point that as one of the editors of the journal you wrote both the copy on the website and the copy in the WP article and were happy with both. Unfortunately while I have absolutely no doubt that this is the case, there is no cast iron way of establishing this and "I wrote the website so I hereby give permission for the text to appear on WP" would be frequently abused if it were to be allowed as a defence. There is a way of formally giving permission via the system outlined here. There's quite a lot to read there but the simplest route might be to put the following text on your journal website:

The text of this website [or page, if you are specifically releasing one section] is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I do see that your site refers to the Creative Commons license, but it's not exactly the above text; I'm not a licensing expert here on WP and don't know whether the existing text suffices or not! Once the full text is there (and obviously only the genuine owner of that page can put it there) it may be freely copied here on WP. That's one hurdle, but there is a second which is around the potential conflict of interest with you being on the board of the eJHI and also acting as an editor here at WP. You're clearly not a single purpose account because although you've made relatively few edits, they go back a long way and cover a range of areas. Nevertheless, as a member of the editorial board you are keen to see your journal have its own page here at WP and that makes it hard (not impossible, just hard...) for you to edit the page objectively. Please do read the material at WP:SPI and consider how you'll get round this.

Then finally there is the issue of notability. In principle only notable subjects get an article, and notability is proved by reference to reliable sources. In practice, looking at the many open access journals listed on WP, hardly any have a single source cited! But if you modelled your article on the one at, say, Emerging Infectious Diseases, you'd have at least some source to cite. By the way, that article also has a helpful template which you could copy into yours - I have tried to do so in your user space article but obviously have left blanks which you could fill in.

I hope this is helpful - please reply here if you need any more input, I will keep this page on my watchlist. When the article is ready, just copy and paste into article space (or tell me, and I'll do it for you). I hope this helps! Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 11:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Kim, the article was very much work in progress. I had just setup the framework and another eJHI editor was going to enhance it with sources and then we were going to invite the eJHI readers to contribute further - however, your "axe" was quicker...

Yes, I did look at other Open source Journals and modeled our entry on them - but obviously were not quick enough.

I don't think I can change the eJHI copyright, but another option that I read about on WP was to do an Authorisation E-mail to WP. Would that be an option?

Klaus

Hi there, yes it's always a risk putting up a new page into article space - leaving it at your user space while others contribute will help it's chances of survival. Others can of course edit it while it's in your userspace so there's no problem there. I don't know for certain about the copyright statement; your site mentions CC3.0 but not GNU and I don't know if the latter is essential. You could ask someone via the OTRS system or release the material via the procedure outlined here but to be honest the easiest option is just to rewrite the same material into a paraphrase. The problem was that as it stood, it was a word-for-word copy. Good luck and don't hesitate to message again here or on my talk page if you need more help. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 12:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks for your comments. Excuse my naivety, but where would I find the userspace? K.

The draft in question is here - in principle you can make any page at all in your user space just by starting a page called User:KVeil/Your title of choice here!. That link would go blue once the page was actually in existence. I see you're getting the hang of indenting talk space comments using :::: but don't forget to sign talk space mesages too by putting ~~~~ after your comments, which will produce your signature or, in this case, mine! Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 13:14, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Kim.

Greetings to Sheffield Uni - my middle daughter is a psychologist too, she works in our unemployment & social service "CentreLink". KVeil (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks - you've tracked down my RL identity I perceive (not difficult with my username...) As it happens I've collaborated with some health informatics folks here in the UK at St George's (University of London) - Simon de Lusignan and Tom Chan. Have you come across them at all? Small world, eh? Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 14:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

FHIR is back

FHIR is back, and I just saw your earlier work. Some of the earlier material might be appropriate. Thanks. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Australian Council of Professions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Australian Council of Professions, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Council of Professions

Hello, KVeil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Australian Council of Professions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 10:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Meg Keneally

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Meg Keneally has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi GW - not sure why you speedy deleted Meg Keneally page? It's a bit of WIP, but quite extensively referenced in major art and new publications? Tnx KVeil (talk) 23:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)