User talk:Wolbring
Gregor Wolbring was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
DeleteInsufficiently Famous. Richard Taylor 01:30, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Comment, no vote: fame and notability are not the same thing, especially in the scientific world. Institutes founded by subject may be noteworthy, any comments from those more au fait with this area? Ianb 22:01, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems quite well known. Don't really understand why this is up for deletion. This isn't a vanity page.--Tomheaton 22:21, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. He's not that well known, but after a bit of googling, I think he's at least borderline notable -- not as a scientist per se, but as a speaker on ethics (especially the rights of the disabled), and apparently as an antitranshumanist or antinanotechnologist as well. --Aponar Kestrel (talk) 22:45, 2004 Oct 11 (UTC)
- Keep. Moderately notable ethicist. — Gwalla | Talk 02:31, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Pretty obvious keep —siroχo 09:11, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. 1600 Google hits. Twice as many as J. Fred Muggs.--NathanHawking 20:04, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC)
End archived discussion -- Graham ☺ | Talk 02:03, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Wolbring
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Wolbring. What you say here will be public for others to see.
