Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inevitable incest
Appearance
Added to VfD by Modemac, I was about to redirect it to Incest, but I'll let it stand here. Then again, I'm not sure how useful a term 'Inevitable incest' is anyway, so possibly delete. Darksun 12:57, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, essay. Gazpacho 13:03, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- More importantly, there is nothing linking to this article and its subject is already covered under incest and incest taboo. Delete.
- Delete, content like that is just not salvagable, especially when we already have articles on it. Shane King 13:21, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
- What a hell? Delete this rant not based on fact or the chill waters of dispassionate reason. No point in a redirect, as this would be a never-sought lemma. Geogre 14:07, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Original essay. --Improv 18:18, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Essay. — Bill 19:45, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, Obvious original research and junk like this really ought to be speedied. -Vina 20:22, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a POV rant. Not encyclopedic. All useful info is already present in Incest. — Gwalla | Talk 04:10, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. POV, poorly written, unencyclopaedic rant. -- Necrothesp 01:47, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)