This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Devil Wears Prada (novel) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

My original idea was to see if I could do this whole article in one sitting. I didn't, but three days ... well, about as long as it took to read the book in the first place. Not bad.

A shoutout to Carole Allan for giving me her copy.

Daniel Case 21:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When I was reading this article I thought to myself "This was written in one sitting, at high speed." ... perhaps it well matches the material of the novel it covers, but it takes the form of one enormous run-on sentence. It would be vastly improved by going back and dealing with all the comma splices.

--Fade 14:39, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, and I've started tightening at least the plot summary up. I should do better. Daniel Case 21:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

needs more tightening--no one needs to read the book after reading that!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.12 (talk • contribs)

Watch for the coming Wikibooks study guide. Daniel Case 14:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Factual errors" Errors

just because something is rather dated doesn't mean it's an error. also, being in the beauty department of a fashion magazine still means that you are working in fashion.!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.12 (talk • contribs)

These errors were culled from one of the reviews linked to, which makes it clear also that Weisberger got confused while she was writing the book. Fashion magazines have a fashion department, after all, and that's what's meant in the book when "fashion" is referred to within Runway. Daniel Case 22:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Lauren is terminally confused anyway! :D But we (who are currently employed by fashion magazines) consider ALL STAFF as "working in fashion". :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.12 (talk • contribs)

I would sort of thought so too, but what do I know? Daniel Case 17:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does Andrea pick up a french bulldog or a persian kitten?

First paragraph of the plot summary: 'The novel begins with its main character, Andrea Sachs, ... She has picked up the Porsche roadster ... tells her to pick up her pet French bulldog from the veterinarian's office. Trying to comply, Andrea ruins some of the expensive designer clothing she is wearing.'

I changed this to cat and it got changed back to French bulldog, but I have the book in front of me, p5 'Cara laughed for what felt lide ten minutes before she said, "Madeline's their persian kitten and she's at the vet. Just got spayed."'

Could this be a difference between editions? My edition is by Harper Collins, London 2003. Why would they change this?

Perhaps the article should say 'French bulldog/Persian kitten'.

ChristineD 14:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting question. I think the article should reflect this clear difference between the British and American editions (because my edition clearly says French bulldog). Would you be willing to scan the page and email it to me just so we've got some proof? I'd be willing to scan my page 5 in return. Daniel Case 15:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this helps in seeing the British edition. Indeed, the pet has been changed from a dog to a cat.

http://browseinside.harpercollins.co.uk/index.aspx?isbn13=9780007156108 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.140.97.231 (talk) 02:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Run a search above for "spayed" and it does indeed take you to page 5 - where Madelaine is introduced as a Persian cat that's just been spayed. I'd be interested to know what the dog version is - you can neuter a dog (obviously) but the terminology and procedure is quite different, so would need more than a quick find/replace on "bulldog" to "Persian cat"

Also, given that the article no longer includes this distinction, I don't think it really matters, apart from curiosity. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Streep and Hathaway in DWP film.jpg

Image:Streep and Hathaway in DWP film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Couverture du diable s'habille en Prada.jpg

Image:Couverture du diable s'habille en Prada.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Good!

Congratulations to user:76.255.62.233] for taking on the badly needed editing.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conde Nast

The article claims that 'no conde nast publication reviewed or mentions' devil wears prada. But the new yorker is conde nast, right? Llamabr (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a review of the film (which, as I once noted in the film article, goes out of its way at one point to trash the book), not the book. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]