Talk:Pat Cadigan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the article was nominated for deletion by mistake: see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pat Cadigan. Mikkalai 23:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

this article doesn't mention pat cadigan's short story "angel" that apeared in the 1987 may issue of Isaac asimov's science fiction magazine

Bibliography

I've more or less finished editing this entry to resemble a true bibliography, as I've done previously to the entries of Brian Stableford, Fred Saberhagen, Nancy Kress & Charles Sheffield. The Deadpan Allie series remains a mystery, though: is the novel Mindplayers a fix-up of the stories, a sequel, what? For that matter, I'm sure there are other stories out there; I'll add them as I find them. Tom Dean (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: A few days ago, I received a memo in My Talk about my posting of a Bibliography in the entry of Nancy Kress. Apparently, some consider the entry to be "gigantic" and too daunting to a "casual" Wikipedia user , whatever that is. Consequently, I will be spending the next week or so creating collapsible tables for the entries that I have edited at Wikipedia, including Cadigan's here. Tom Dean (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deadpan Allie

I finally managed to locate a copy of Mindplayers (my personal copy is buried in storage somewhere), and it is indeed a fix-up; thus, the entry is updated this date. Now, if I could only find a copy of "A Lie for a Lie," which I'm pretty sure is the last of the Deadpan Allie stories... Tom Dean (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Today, I purchased an ebook copy of Ellen Datlow's anthology, Wild Justice, which first saw life in 1996 as Lethal Kisses. After reading Pat Cadigan's novelette "A Lie for a Lie," I'm convinced it's a Deadpan Allie story, although the protagonist's name never seems to be mentioned. A sentence near the end gives it away: "But I don't lie, even by omission, and this would mean I had to." Tom Dean (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, I finished reading the whole schmeer: Mindplayers, "Dirty Work," & "A Lie for A Lie." Quite a saga, although I was more than a little disappointed in Mindplayers; most of the interstitial material around the sections titled "Nearly Departed," "Variation on a Man," & "Lunatic Bridge" involve the character Jerry Wirerammer, whose exploits with Allie I found to be as dull as dishwater. I can see why "A Lie for a Lie" has rarely if ever been listed as a Deadpan Allie story: although she is, as usual, the narrator, her name never comes up, nor that of her former boss/company, associates, etc. However, she mentions the "aphasia traslator" that has been installed in her eye, and she is frequently inhibited by an inability to speak. Deadpan Allie suffered permanent aphasia and speechlessness as a result of the mindcrime at the end of "Dirty Work." If there are any additional Deadpan Allie stories out there, I'm not aware of them. Tom Dean (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pat Cadigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox error?

Currently the Infobox includes "Born: Patricia Oren Kearney Cadigan" and from the text we learn "Cadigan met her first husband, Rufus Cadigan, while in college . . . ."

So, did she happen to marry a man with the same surname; or did Rufus take her surname on marriage (believable in the SF community); or is the infobox in error and she was actually born "Patricia Oren Kearney", or Patricia Oren Kearney [Anothername]"?

Not an important point, but the anomaly leapt out and mugged me while I was reading the article. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.199.169.177 (talk) 04:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. In the unlikely event that this claim is true, it needs a citation. I've removed it. Dan Bloch (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]