User talk:DanielAmelang

Che Guevara

Just for what it's worth: "shield from scandal" and "shield from a scandal" are equally legitimate. The former uses scandal in a more abstract meaning, comparable to "shield from obloquy". -- Jmabel | Talk 02:09, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

I see. The reason that the abstract meaning didn't feel right to me was that it was being used in a specific sense. In other words, "The birth certificate may have been deliberately falsified to help shield the family from scandal." sounds right, while the sentence I edited was: "The birth certificate may have been deliberately falsified to help shield the family from scandal relating to his mother's...", which is not an abstract "shield from scandal" case, but a "shield from a scandal relating to..." specific case of a scandal. Obviously a personal taste issue now that I think it through further. On a side note, it's pretty funny/embarassing that my edit summary was 'grammer' :p . Someone should have edited my edit summary for 'spelling'. Anyway, I can't believe that I spent energy on the issue in the first place, so feel free to revert. It was nice to chat with a well-respected wikipedian, though. Thanks for the note. --Dan 05:11, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)