Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetheart
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Sweetheart was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
- I suggest moving girlfriend here and reworded to talk about this kind of person regardless of sex. Boyfriend, which looks like a dictionary definition, should be merged and re-directed. Note that the article for the company will remain at Sweetheart (company), and we can still have a link to it at the top of the merged article. 66.245.64.202 20:17, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Completely inappropriate VfD listing IMO. I have reservations about the idea too, but the main point is, there's no need to delete anything to do this anyway. Andrewa 20:29, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- reject not vfd material. To anon, please log in. This is not a case for vfd; discuss it on the article's talk page. The current procedure for requesting merges should go to Wikipedia:duplicate articles or to the village pump. Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:32, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:32, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I also put it in the Duplicate article section, but I am putting Sweetheart itself on Vfd because I think it should be deleted to prepare for a page move. Any better way to do this that doesn't involve deleting this page?? 66.245.64.202 20:34, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Short answer is yes. Long answer doesn't belong on VfD. Please see your talk page. Andrewa 20:42, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- But now see mainly talk:boyfriend. Andrewa 01:32, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I also put it in the Duplicate article section, but I am putting Sweetheart itself on Vfd because I think it should be deleted to prepare for a page move. Any better way to do this that doesn't involve deleting this page?? 66.245.64.202 20:34, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Reject. As stated, not VfD -- can this be removed from VfD, actually? --Aponar Kestrel (talk) 00:47, 2004 Oct 12 (UTC)
- Keep. Boyfriend, Girlfriend, Significant other, Romantic love, Courtship, and now [{Sweetheart]]. I think all these articles reflect very subtle nuances in our cultural practices and should all be separate articles. Someone should coordinate them better, methinks. <-- this is Fishal (func(talk) 03:48, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC))
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.