User talk:Muj0
Please feel free to comment here. Criticism is welcome.
LDSInfobox
[edit]Noticed you put the LDSInfobox on David O. McKay. I was just about to put it on all the presidents but would welcome any help you could give - I had waited for comments before widely disseminating - there have been only a few - all positive so I guess it is a go. Thanks again Trödel|talk 21:57, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
I agree - they look much better with photo's - I will work on finding some - the key is the copyright issue - as I could scan in some that I have but I don't own the copyright to them. Trödel|talk 22:20, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Thx again for helping with the Infobox - I put up a proposal to put in who created the vacancy instead of prior and next in seniorty in the 12 on the Infobox talk page. Trödel|talk
Ninam wrote: "yep, there is no "nunneries" on Mt. Athos, only Ascetic nuns (houses of ascetisam)".
I wrote: Not a grammar mistake, my ignorance. sorry
Ninam wrote: Please, do not worry :) --Ninam 21:04, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I wrote: I appreciate the work that you have done on this article. I've been feeling that it needed to be redone for a long time, I just never got the energy to do it. Muj0 21:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. It took some time tidying up the article, but it definetly needed it! Hopefully the other US military pages could be improved soon. Regards. Astrotrain 21:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Why are three grades of the USAF chain of command designated "First Sergeant" ? Imagine three of them, different grades, same rank designation, "pulling rank" on each other. I had kin in the USAF who had seen officers,enlisted personnel who LOVE to pull rank. An example is that there is a BIG mess in a hangar, three personnel in there, this happens:"I'm a CAPTAIN, sergeant, YOU clean this mess up.", then another man states,"I'm a GENERAL, Captain, YOU clean up this mess!!".Martial Law 02:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
In the US Army there is only one rank that is First Sergeant (1SG). In the USAF "First Sergeant" is not considered a rank, so much as a job. So, a Master Sergeant, Senior Master Sergeant or A Chief Master Sergeant all could be a "First Sergeant" but, you wouldn't have more than one First Sergeant in the same unit. Does that make sense? Muj0 22:53, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Sure doesMartial Law 23:01, 24 October 2005 (UTC) :)
You ever have kin that told you about officers,NCOs pulling rank ? My kin has seen this going on.Martial Law 05:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC) :)
There is a saying in the military "crap rolls downhill" that means, that whoever is the lowest ranking ends up doing the worst jobs. Pulling rank is pretty normal. I see it all the time. Muj0 19:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
I think you might have done a typo on Minot Air Force Base regarding when Semi Automatic Ground Environment was shut down. See Talk:Minot Air Force Base Cafe Nervosa 04:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
I don't like to argue, it seems that you have plenty of sources that do not agree, but I got my information from Minot's Official Website Muj0 05:04, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- You ask a question that can start a lengthy debate, but deactivation in May 1963 seams like a waste of money. There may have been "military intelligence" behind the deactivation. I will return the Minot SAGE deactivation into the artcile, but perhaps others can shed light on why this installation was deactivated while the SAGE network was operated into the1980s. Cafe Nervosa | talk 18:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up that clumsy addition to Monterey, California. I'd had the page open in my browser to fix, but kept putting it off. Procrastination wins again! Cheers, -Willmcw 22:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Mason Patrick
[edit]I am the portrait artist that painted the official portrait of Maj. Gen. Mason Patrick. It can be seen at my website www.stevenrogers.com I would appreciate it if we could use my portrait as the picture for the page. Several famous subjects have used their portrait for their wiki photo, and my painting is very realistic. Many people think its a photo. I am applying to grad school now and I would love to be able to say that my painting is on General Patricks wiki page. Please email me at spam.rogers@gmail.com. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srogers312 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Muj0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Muj0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Do you know what site , document or release this was from? It would also be nice to have a definitive date for this, as orgainzational structures can change a lot in a decade. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Oblivion Society for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Oblivion Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oblivion Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
"National Cryptologic Schooll" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect National Cryptologic Schooll. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#National Cryptologic Schooll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 05:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Air Staff.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, superseded by File:Airstaff.png.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kiki Rockwell
[edit] Hello, Muj0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kiki Rockwell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kiki Rockwell
[edit]
Hello, Muj0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kiki Rockwell".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)