Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fichu

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ugen64 19:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fichu

Certainly a topic worthy of an encyclopedic article. However, after removing the dictionary.com copyvio, the article consists of a number of claims that seem largely unverifiable trivia. Was Jack London obsessed with fichu? Did A. E. van Vogt's wife wear a fichu when they were writing? And who is this Fredrick W.C. Charles, anyway? Rl 17:28, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored a basic definition of "fichu" and reformatted the article. I removed some of the obviously non-encyclopedic material but did not verify the claims which remain. If these can be verified, I vote to keep the article because it does go beyond the scope of a dictionary definition. If the claims are shown to be false, I vote to delete the vandalism. Dystopos 19:16, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The supposed literary references in the article were unverifiable and bore the faint odor of mischief. There's not much left to make it encyclopedic. Perhaps a scholar of costume could make something of it. Dystopos 14:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to wiktionary. At this point there is nothing left of the article but a dicdef. carmeld1 00:16, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.