User talk:MIT Trekkie

Hi MIT Trekkie, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few helpful links to start you off: Avoiding common mistakes, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style, Policies and guidelines, Help, Merging pages.

If you need help or are curious about something, feel free to ask on my talk page or the village pump. You can sign your name and a date stamp on comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian!

Andre (talk) 20:38, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

Requests for comment for user Beachy

Hi Trekkie, I'd would to put User:Beachy on Wikipedia:Requests for comment because he has not improved over months. Some of the problems:

Starts and continues edit wars
Impolite to other users
Personal attacks
Personal biases (e.g. Spread Firefox (SFX) is zealous)
Addition of factually incorrect information
Addition of speculation that flavor him (his pro-IE view)
Never admit that he is biased

You can see Talk:Internet Explorer and Talk:Mozilla Firefox (and the articles' history) for the various responses made by Beachy, which shows some of the points above. The RFC page said that both you and me have to write the user subpage for things like documenting our individual efforts on stopping the violations made by Beachy. That's why I'm asking for your help.

Please answer by replying here or at my user page. Thanks. :-) --minghong 18:44, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would be fine with that. So do you just want me to describe my efforts to stop his perceived violations of Wikipedia policy, or would you like me to help to describe the perceived violations themselves? I would like more details on how exactly this should work. -- MIT Trekkie 19:10, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

I don't really know how this thing works really. :-P But I think Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Comment about individual users would be helpful. You can take a look of examples like Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Zivinbudas too. Call me if you need help. I got to sleep now. :-o --minghong 19:25, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think it may be prudent to wait a while before posting a request for comment. As Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Comment about individual users states, "Once the request for comment is open, these two people must document their individual efforts, provide evidence that those efforts have failed to produce change, and sign the comment page." As your post on User talk:Beachy took place earlier today (according to my time zone), this may prove difficult. Perhaps we should wait to see whether Beachy continues his current behavior (which seems likely), in order that such evidence would be available. I find it unlikely that people will entertain repeated requests for comment about the same user, so if we are to do so, we must endeavor to get it right the first time. What do you think? -- MIT Trekkie 20:13, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

OK. Let's wait for a week or more to see if he would change his behavior. --minghong 07:28, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I think I'll try to work together some kind of argument regarding alleged past abuses in the meantime. -- MIT Trekkie 13:06, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

I have a rough draft of a proposed RFC at User talk:MIT Trekkie/BeachyRFC. minghong, please take a look and let me know what you think. -- MIT Trekkie 03:22, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Visual Basic Wikibook

I see you have contributed to the Visual Basic article on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic? --Kjwhitefoot 07:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm a bit busy these days. --MIT Trekkie 14:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Boston

Hi MIT Trekkie. My addition of a POV tag to the "Boston" page wasn't intended to be vandalism. If you look at the talk page for the article I put my opinion that directing "Boston" to "Boston, Mass." is POV - US-centric. Boston, Mass is obviously bigger and of more world significance than Boston, Lincs., but the American city is named after the English town, so going to the disambiguation page seems NPOV to me. Dancarney 23:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the misunderstanding. I guess I get a little punchy at times. I just found it a bit weird to have a redirect not work because there was a tag there as well. Perhaps there is a better way to indicate what you intended. - MIT Trekkie 02:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic R

I was wondering if you still have the game Sonic R...

Yes, I do. Why do you ask?

P.S. Please use ~~~~ to sign your posts - MIT Trekkie 17:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because I need it bad.Real bad. Chuchugaga 19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you have in mind. I would think you could find it on eBay or Amazon.com or something if you want it. - MIT Trekkie 00:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A 1998 game?? Can't you send it to me? Chuchugaga 16:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm not willing to give you my copy of Sonic R. However, a quick search of Amazon reveals this web page [1], which offers 14 new and used copies of Sonic R through third parties. - MIT Trekkie 19:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm okay but I dont trust online shopping so I won't do that.thanks anyway. Chuchugaga 17:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU

thanks for gettin rid of that vandalism on Steve Ballmer's page. i was in the process of reverting it but you beat me to it =) CrazyAwesome (talk) 07:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. - MIT Trekkie (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pocket Tunes

The article Pocket Tunes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for references since 2013

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MIT Trekkie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sample Analog Stick.jpg

The file File:Sample Analog Stick.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]