Immediate requests	Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Wikipedians looking for help	1
Requests for unblock	93
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests	81
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests	52
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests	6
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	7
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests	25
Requested RD1 redactions	3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	2
Candidates for speedy deletion	13
Open sockpuppet investigations	12
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Requested RD1 redactions

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Wikipedia fully protected edit requests

Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems

Template:Admin dashboard

Template:Admin dashboard/light

Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox

Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Template:Did you know/Queue

Template:DYK queue/backlog

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

75.141.155.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Making racial vandalism edits on Racial segregation in the United States. Demt1298 (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
38.137.157.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning SmittenGalaxy | talk! 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Question: @SmittenGalaxy:, can you please explain how the edits are vandalism?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
64.106.111.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On SSF: vandalism after final warning. Persistent disruptive editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
209.249.71.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) I reverted an unconstructive but fairly benign edit from this school IP. Turns out almost all contribs have been reverted, and the two recent ones that weren't are also questionable. This probably needs a short block, hopefully they'll create an account so we can actually talk to them. Toadspike [Talk] 19:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
192.12.184.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) repeated disruption and warnings for the last ten years. Sweetpool50 (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Please sufficiently warn the user if they continue disruption and re-report to AIV if they continue past the warnings. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

2402:4000:13F1:CE12:9C69:63E:F071:713D (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Continued vandalism, disruptive editing, and addition of material without proper verifiable references even after lvl 4 warning – Bradby Shield Encounter, Vidyartha College, and St. Sylvester's College. QEnigma (talk) 19:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
149.50.164.87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Realized after warning that all contribs are BLP vios. Toadspike [Talk] 19:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note that there's a difference between adding unsourced content to a BLP and an actual BLP violation.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

80.79.145.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Cell-mediated immunity: vandalism after final warning. Repeated vandalism after warnings and blocks; WP:NOTHERE. Zefr (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. @Zefr: Do not warn a user and then immediately report them. You warned them 4 and a half hours after their only vandalism edit, then immediately came here after warning. It seems fairly clear this doesn't need immediate attention. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion	Entries
User requested	0
Empty articles	0
Nonsense pages	0
Spam pages	7
Importance or significance not asserted	0
Possibly contested candidates	2
Other candidates	6

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:

( source / chronological order / expired )

Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

Reddasfxk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: fu*c+k. Violating string: reddasfcksk" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Instagramifunnnyuserreddittfarc3e (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzskibidi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Franken-Loser (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "loser" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Grieferggfff (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "grief(er|ing)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file in gaming slang a "griefer" is an aggressive player that gets their kicks from disrupting others -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Theoriesaboutyourchildhood (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

My username is not "my username" (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Southern Eye Center, LLC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Rubberduckyfanclub7 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Orases Marketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Promotional? 1" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Xyilo1488 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "1488" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file 1488 is a well known Neo-Nazi symbol -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Imubetatta (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "tatta" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note on file stands for testicle(s -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

Brandonwilliams1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and disruptive username. The user recently edited the page for the politician, Brandon Williams. Clearly COI, however this user also can be an impersonator. (If any action is better than this please do it!). ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 17:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Jessicacandrews (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Appears to be that of a well-known person. See this user's Talk page, User_talk:Jessicacandrews, and the article referred to there, Jessica_Andrews_(writer). Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Given their contributions, I've seen nothing to indicate that this isn't a person using their real name. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Burkesschool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Edits to Katherine Delmar Burke School. Frist edit summary called account "the communications office" [1]. Meters (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Peanut (squirrel)

Peanut (squirrel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing - this has become something of a political issue and that's bringing a lot of attention to the article. While there is a fair amount of both disruptive edits and good faith disagreement among registered users that is resulting in frequent changes to the article, I'm hoping that semi-protected status will help lower the amount of disruptive edits we need to keep up with. Cheers, Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 04:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The IPs' edits seem on par with the autoconfirmed editors' (some bits of content are being edit-warred, with some accounts add the same things the IPs add, and as filer notes the autoconfirmed editors are making high levels of disputed changes as well). So SEMI is not going to help substantially or be a fair solution. There are reasonable edit-summaries and general civility, so I'm holding off with FULL for now. Talkpage is active. DMacks (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Kurakhove

Battle of Kurakhove (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: CTOP Hoben7599 (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely under WP:GS/RUSUKR. SilverLocust 💬 20:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Second presidency of Donald Trump

Second presidency of Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Trichloroethylene

Trichloroethylene (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A non-small-IP-range and several other IPs repeatedly adding non-MEDRS-supported content and now also abusive edit-summaries. DMacks (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

United States presidential election

United States presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: People are unhappy with the results of the US presidential election. I imagine more vandalism is coming with regard to the edit I just reverted. I recommend semi-protecting this page as a precaution. Simplediscipline (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

This may not be necessary in retrospect, but I figured I'd put the request in anyway. Deny if not applicable/required by situation. Simplediscipline (talk) 13:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Claudia De la Cruz

Claudia De la Cruz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Tisza Party

Tisza Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Paris Innovation

Draft:Paris Innovation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. C F A 💬 15:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Note: I would be loath to protect a draft, tbh, but the draft as it is might well qualify for a G11 speedy deletion......"bringing together together all the initiatives in favor of..." alone rings some bells. Lectonar (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

There are a lot of drafts created by McSyl that keep being resubmitted by IP socks. I get one every 5 or so random drafts. They're just wasting reviewer time. I could take them to MFD, but I think semi-protection until their timers expire would be easier. C F A 💬 16:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Dragon Age: The Veilguard

Talk:Dragon Age: The Veilguard (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP accounts annoyed that they've been blocked from editing the associated article are now filling up the talk page with claims of censorship. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Communes of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Communes of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Took almost 2 months to detect it (see history), I've reverted it now TheWikipede (talk) 17:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

@TheWikipede The only vandalism that I see was reverted within 7 minutes, not two months. Other than that one flurry of activity, it doesn't look like persistent vandalism. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Allan Lichtman

Allan Lichtman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The page needs protection to stop any censorship attempts. Kalbome22 (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

BG Pathum United F.C.

BG Pathum United F.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by rotating IPs. Anwegmann (talk) 19:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Samuel de Champlain

Samuel de Champlain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Gatorade

Gatorade (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – would also be ok with pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Racial policy of Nazi Germany

Racial policy of Nazi Germany (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock and proxy edit warring issues. Grayfell (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Second impeachment of Donald Trump

Second impeachment of Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Talk:Mohammed Deif

Talk:Mohammed Deif (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotect: The talk page was recently semi-protected due to unregistered users using the talk page as WP:FORUM on Mohammed Deif's death. At the time, his death was in dispute. Now that his death is no longer in dispute, and the article shows him as dead, I don't think the talk page needs to be semi-protected any more. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Any thougths on that request? Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Update: the death is still in dispute. Hamas has disputed the report that it has acknowledged the death. For now, it seems that the consensus is to have the article show that he is dead, and note the dispute. Since the WP:FORUM comments were from the side that wanted to have the article show Deif as dead, I don't expect this activity to resume. I also don't expect it to now come from the other side.

Please note that semi-protecting the talk page means that non-confirmed editors cannot make edit requests. This means that protection on talk pages should be applied only under the most extreme circumstances. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

So do we want to lift the protection or not? Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I think for a talk page, it's been protected for too long. Unprotect and see how it goes. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Meitei language

Meitei language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is not vandalized and was not being vandalized by unregistered users, I don't think the protection was necessary and should be lowered to either semi-protected or unprotected. ミラへぜ (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@ミラへぜ: The reason given for protection was Arbitration enforcement, most likely India-Pakistan. While this protection is over a year old at this point, you should have asked Courcelles (talk · contribs) if they'd be willing to unprotect first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

I wouldn't object to lowering it to semiprotection. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Shortcut

WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Gaza genocide

Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[2] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[3][4][5].VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[6]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[7] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[8] VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[9]][[10]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.

My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).

If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[11][12] and a form of Holocaust erasure [13], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[14][15][16][17]".VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

The text I originally wanted modified was changed to "Israel's supporters say that accusing Israel of genocide is antisemitic, but others argue antisemitism should not be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations" after other discussions on the talk page. I almost like it better, but by saying "Israel's supporters" it relieves some of the responsibility from the Israeli government in the accusations that was, to an extent, duly credited in the original modification. Maybe now, it should just say "The Israeli government and their supporters say that accusing the state for genocide antisemitic..." or something similar. Ecco2kstan (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stated Israeli tank losses in casualty and losses infobox are incorrect, attributed article from Business Insider states "The IDF again had problems with anti-tank missiles during the 2006 war in Lebanon, when Hezbollah employed Russian-made Kornets. Though about 50 Merkavas were damaged, only five were destroyed, according to the IDF, which also struggled with poorly maintained vehicles and ill-trained crews." Casualties and losses box states this number as if it was from current conflict. Article does, however, state that "Israel has lost nearly two dozen tanks during fighting with Hamas since October 7." I believe losses of tanks in the infobox should be fixed to reflect this. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

14 protected edit requests

v·h

Page	Tagged since	Protection level	Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request)	2024-09-03 23:19	Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log)	Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Noarticletext-nopermission (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-editnotice (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotice load (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log)	From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice load/notext (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log)	From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice/notice (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-14: "Highly visible template: and included in a high-risk template"
Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Editnotices (request)	2024-10-08 20:04	Title blacklist (log)	Matching line: `Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit\|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>`
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request)	2024-10-09 18:48	MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request)	2024-10-29 04:22	MediaWiki page (log)	Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Module:Separated entries (request)	2024-10-29 12:19	Fully protected (log)	Modified by Amorymeltzer on 2018-12-17: "High-risk Lua module: Over 2M transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Similar (request)	2024-11-02 08:11	Fully protected (log)	From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Similar: Protected by AmandaNP on 2011-05-31: "User request within own user space"
Template:CatAutoTOC (request)	2024-11-05 21:08	Fully protected (log)	Protected by Xaosflux on 2023-12-07: "High-risk template or module"

Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

6 template-protected edit requests

v·h

Page	Tagged since	Protection level	Last protection log entry
Module:Lang-zh (request)	2024-10-10 09:41	Template-protected (log)	From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Coat of arms (request)	2024-10-30 09:36	Template-protected (log)	Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Canada province decade category (request)	2024-11-05 18:40	Template-protected (log)	From Template:DecadecatCanadaprovince: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-09-28: "Highly visible template: Over 170 categories are wholly dependent on this template"
Template:Canada province decade category/core (request)	2024-11-05 18:46	Template-protected (log)	From Template:DecadecatCanadaprovince/core: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-09-28: "Highly visible template: Over 170 categories are wholly dependent on this template"
Template:Military history decade category/core (request)	2024-11-06 13:57	Template-protected (log)	From Template:Milhistdecadecat/core: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-03-04: "Highly visible template: Used in about 100 category pages, which are wholly dependant on this template"
Template:Lists by year cat/nav (request)	2024-11-06 14:16	Template-protected (log)	Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2018-11-21: "Highly visible template"

Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Voorts	140	11	4	93	21:06, 8 November 2024	2 days, 0 hours	no	report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

Last updated by ^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} at 20:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Davidindia

Davidindia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)} He has created a remarkable total of 647 articles on English Wikipedia, with only 4 deletions. This impressive accomplishment highlights his expertise and dedication. Primarily, he focuses on biographies of sportspersons and politicians, demonstrating a strong understanding of these subjects. Additionally, he treats fellow editors with respect and professionalism. Thank you! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Though all the articles they have created cover notable subjects, almost all of them are missing a talk page, which are then created by NPPs. Some older articles are missing default sort, DMY formatting and very short articles do not need multiple sections; rather, they should be consolidated into a single Life or Career section. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:AxonsArachnida

AxonsArachnida (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

They have created 545 clean articles, none of which have been deleted. Their creations focus on spider species articles, so I believe their articles no longer need to go through NPP review. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 06:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Currently created 631 articles, with 86 more added since this nomination. No single one was deleted. GrabUp - Talk 08:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Done, no issues seen. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 19:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Mims Mentor

Mims Mentor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting autopatrolled rights as I have a strong understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those concerning biographies of living persons and notability. Over the past five years, I have actively contributed by combating vandalism and ensuring articles adhere to these guidelines. Additionally, I have created 60 articles that align with Wikipedia's standards.--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 11:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:OpalYosutebito

OpalYosutebito (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([18]). — MusikBot ^talk 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Your use of AWB appears to have been removed rather than for inactivity - can you explain why or how you will use AWB within the rules and guidelines going forward? Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

{{not done}}, no reply. Primefac (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I didn't receive a reply notification, sorry. I will not focus on flat-out removing unknown parameters like before, but instead fixing them (the biggest example being using the "via" parameter instead of "agency" for some of the citation templates). - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Cooldudeseven7

Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: I have achieved 500 mainspace edits and I feel like this tool will be used so that I can contribute to wikipedia while expanding my knowledge of it- as well as how these tools work. This tool will be handy in my improvement of wikipedia articles no matter stub or good articles. This tool will be so handy in fixing problems that are in multiple articles! Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 13:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Cooldudeseven7, do you actually see a need for this right now or is it just a thing you are wanting to play around with? Primefac (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I am trying to first make categories follow WP:CATSPECIFIC, I also am trying to do bulk additions of inline citations, as well as general cleanup to articles in bulk. Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 12:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Tule-hog

Tule-hog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

(See rescinded previous request.) There are many tasks I undertake that AWB would make easier, but the immediate task is finding 'what redirects here' for Effective radiated power to clean its odd anchor 'Equivalent radiated power (Redirected)' in the second paragraph. I do a fair bit of redirect work, so the ability to examine database dumps without dragging out my minimal MariaDB chops would be nice. I need to dig into Pywikibot as well, but I'd like to try the GUI offered by AWB. Tule-hog (talk) 16:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([19]). — MusikBot ^talk 16:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

The anchor Equivalent radiated power (Redirected) is only on Equivalent radiated power, so I do not see anything to "fix". Primefac (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

(Effective isotropic radiated power and EIRP also use the format. It is difficult to verify there is only one redirect to each when sorting through ~20,000 'what links here's. I have never seen the (Redirected) format used anywhere else, which is why I thought to 'fix' it.) Is there another tool with a lower barrier of entry which has the same functionality as 'what redirects here' in AWB? Tule-hog (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

If you're looking for a specific phrase (such as this one) and a "what links here" doesn't help, you should use an insource: search, for example this is the search for insource:"Equivalent radiated power (Redirected)", which shows that the redirect is the only page that calls it (I suspect that's why the redirect exists in the first place). Primefac (talk) 12:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Does the link you provided show Equivalent radiated power for you? For me it is only the main article. Tule-hog (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, searches do not tend to look at redirects themselves unless there is an intitle search. Primefac (talk) 18:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

To reiterate my original request's intent, I am looking to isolate all the redirects to a given article. Neither insource nor intitle seem to accomplish this, unless I am missing something? Tule-hog (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

(I'll ask at WP:RE for an alternative.) Tule-hog (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The ticket appears to be {{Special:WhatLinksHere/Effective radiated power|hidelinks=1|hidetrans=1}}:

redirects

EIRP (redirect to section "EIRP (Redirected)") (links | edit)
Effective Radiated Power (redirect page) (links | edit)
Equivalent isotropically radiated power (redirect page) (links | edit)
Effective isotropically radiated power (redirect page) (links | edit)
Eirp (redirect page) (links | edit)
Effective Radiated Power (ERP) (redirect page) (links | edit)
Effective isotropically-radiated power (redirect page) (links | edit)
Effective isotropic radiated power (redirect to section "Effective isotropic radiated power (Redirected)") (links | edit)
Equivalent radiated power (redirect to section "Equivalent radiated power (Redirected)") (links | edit)
Equivalent isotropic radiated power (redirect page) (links | edit)
Effective monopole radiated power (redirect page) (links | edit)
EMRP (redirect to section "EMRP") (links | edit)
Cymomotive force (redirect to section "CMF") (links | edit)

Tule-hog (talk) 18:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Request withdrawn, till next time! Tule-hog (talk) 18:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:AWBunny

AWBunny (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

My main account already has access to AWB. Would like access to another account for doing edits which are not that substantial. I would like to retain AWB for my main account. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Done. Primefac (talk) 19:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Primefac Could you also look at the EXCON request for the same account at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed#User:AWBunny. It would help with editing of protected pages as well. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Kingsmasher678

Kingsmasher678 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hey there, I am looking to go through the cave articles and add categories to improve navigation within the area. This would take me literal days to do without access to this tool, as I am hoping to through most of the available articles. I will also be removing tags related to caves when they should refer to mines or quarry, and will be updating things that are manmade to accurately represent that in the articles categories. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([20]). — MusikBot ^talk 16:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Kingsmasher678, would WP:CATALOT not be more useful for this? Primefac (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Is that not only for images? I don’t understand how I would use it for articles.Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Kingsmasher678 Cat-a-lot can be installed here by pasting the code from Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot#As_your_user_gadget into your Special:MyPage/common.js file. It works just as well on articles as it does on images, just instead of clicking the description to select a file, you click in the empty space to the right of the page name in the category listing. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Sweet, that did the trick! Withdrawn. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Request withdrawn (for the bot). Primefac (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:RCSCott91

RCSCott91 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Disambugation links. I really enjoy doing them and I'd like to help bring the "articles with Dab links" number into the 3 digits. If you'll look at my dab history you'll see I have dealt with everything from standard, to Vandalism, to navbox, and even had to update a module for a disambugation link that had been present for a few months. I'm currently null editing manually ~120 pages so they won't be on the dab list and slow anyone else down.

I currently do the majority of my disambugation on mobile, but if granted permission I can allocate two days on desktop to disambiguate. Based on on current normal fluctuations, I'm confident that I can help get disambiguation articles down to triple digits within 3-4 months. (notwithstanding random navbox disambiguation).

I am currently ranked in the top 10 DAB users although that doesn't mean much right now considering the top 2 have about ten times my number. RCSCott91 (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Clarification: I can allocate 2 days per week. Sorry for the ambiguity. RCSCott91 (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Kumar Dayal

Kumar Dayal (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I came across the page Kerala which has duplicate citations. So I would like to try this tool. Kumar Dayal (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Polygnotus/DuplicateReferences may be better for duplicate references (AWB isn't great). Primefac (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

Absolutiva (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I want to replace these links. For example, "LGBTQ" per WP:CONSUB and "minor-planet" for "minor-planet designation" per WP:HYPHEN and Talk:Minor-planet designation#Requested move 21 September 2021. Absolutiva (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Crafterstar

Crafterstar (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to use it for typos. Crafterstar (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:1255979u

1255979u (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hey, I would like to be confirmed as I am engaging in multiple editing already, and would like to further the discussion I have started under the UC Berkeley post. I have been providing edit on the page which has been recognized, but right now the semi-protection posed on the Berkeley wiki has stopped me from editing the post. I've done a few editings with IP address too, without recognizing the need of logging in. Thanks! 1255979u (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Not done autoconfirmed only takes an account age of four days and ten edits. You are already halfway there at five edits. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:WhiteStar2000

WhiteStar2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I would like to request for an autoconfirmed / confirmed status since I have more than 27,000 edits and my account is six years old. Thanks. WhiteStar2000 (talk) 08:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot ^talk 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:AWBunny

AWBunny (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Main account has ~2700 edits, would like this alt to also have XCON. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.
File mover [edit] Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests)

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:TheBirdsShedTears

TheBirdsShedTears (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to request NPR rights. I have prior experience with AfC and NPP, so I'm familiar with the process of reviewing new pages. I'm confident in my understanding of notability guidelines and can easily spot paid/COI editing, as well as unreliable and branded sources. I am also familiar with WP:DP, WP:NOBITING, and CSD

I understand the importance of careful, fair reviews and will do my best to uphold the quality of content on Wikipedia. Thank you! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

not done, this does not address the removal of your permissions last year under suspicion of UPE. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Switching to

On hold so that this doesn't get archived mid-discussion _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

@Rosguill: My account was compromised and i have never been engaged in paid editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

You are expected to be upfront about prior permissions changes and to address these concerns in your initial request. This is now the third time (2, 1) that you have requested permissions since then without addressing this concern in your initial request. That you did not do so does not inspire confidence. You also have not clarified what steps you have taken to prevent your account from being compromised again, which is a necessity before you are conferred any advanced permissions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the chance to explain. I realize I should have addressed this in my initial request, and I'm sorry for not doing so. When my account was compromised, it resulted in my permissions being revoked. I want to be clear that I've never been involved in paid editing.

Since then, I've taken steps to secure my account, including enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on my registered email, setting a strong password for my account, occasionally changing my password, and regularly checking my account activity to prevent any future issues. I understand how serious this is and am fully committed to keeping my account secure going forward.

I'm really keen to contribute positively to Wikipedia again and will approach NPP and other responsibilities with full accountability. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you please also give a timeline of what happened? How many weeks was your account compromised for? What date was it compromised and what date was the compromise stopped? How bad was the damage when it was compromised? What kind of edits did the attackers make? Any idea how it was compromised in the first place? I understand this is a lot of detail to ask, but explaining exactly what happened should be helpful here. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Due to my health concerns, as noted here, I was inactive on the site. I gradually recovered, as mentioned here. However, in June 2022, I experienced health issues again, and this time, I didn’t inform the administrators because I had completely stopped using digital devices. As a result of this inactivity, I wasn't able to monitor my account or review my activity on the site. During this time, when my account was compromised, it was used solely for promotional editing by the attacker. Around 15 days before my account was blocked, I noticed I couldn't reset my password because the attacker had hijacked my email and removed it from my Wikipedia account. I recovered my email soon after realizing it was hacked. Upon reviewing my account activity, I found it in a dire state, used solely for promotional editing, which not only damaged Wikipedia but also hurt the trust I had built over several years of hardwork. I also noticed that the account had been inactive after the attacker created 4 articles between May 2023 and July 2023. I was exploring possible ways to regain access. Since I had previously contacted Materialscientist, I emailed them again (as noted here) in August 2023 to confirm my identity and that my email was the original registered email. However, it seemed they were not available. I then contacted the steward team, who directed me to email ca(at)wikimedia.org. After a series of emails, they video-called me, asked some questions, and eventually restored my account on 16 September 2024. Compromise stopped since i regained access in September 2024 and i took necessary steps to secure my Wikipedia account as well as email address. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for those details. Sorry to hear about your health problems. I hope you're doing a lot better now.

1) So your account was compromised from June 2022 to September 2023 (1 year 3 months)? When we take a look at those edits we should assume those are the attacker?

2) Any idea how your account got compromised? They somehow broke into your email and from there used that to password reset your Wikipedia account and got access to it that way? I guess that means that a) you were specifically targeted by UPEs since random hackers would not know or care about your Wikipedia NPP perm and b) they somehow had your email address? Do you remember any phishing attacks against your email or anything like that? –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

My account was compromised from May 2023 until it was blocked in August 2023, preventing further edits to the mainspace (actual compromise date is not known since i was inactive and under medical observation). The compromise ended when I regained access in September 2024. Any edits made between May and July 2023 were not mine but were done by the attacker. I'm unsure how they accessed my email, but I suspect it occurred after I clicked on a free mobile phone giveaway link shared in a local job offer WhatsApp group (which I have since exited). I downloaded a zip file containing a PDF, unaware that links from untrusted or unknown sources could compromise personal data. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Those dates all seem to line up (stated inactivity dates, compromise dates, XTools activity graph). As long as no UPE-like behavior is found outside the specified compromise dates (contribs link, deleted contribs link, page curation log), and no poor reviewing is found, I think we should consider re-granting NPP. I haven't yet done a deeper check than just dates and any admin should feel free to jump in and help with checking that if they want. –Novem Linguae (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

See the parallel discussion of TheBirdsShedTears' recent autopatrolled request. There xaosflux said the evidence for a compromised account was there but "not definitive" and I'm not sure if anyone ran a CU check at the time. Personally I don't feel comfortable granting rights that we know are actively sought by malicious UPEs (NPR and autopatrolled) based on "not definitive". And if there was a compromise, there's still the question of how it happened, which based on the discussion above still seems to be unclear. – Joe (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

User:GrabUp

GrabUp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hey, I am currently creating articles, and in my free time, I would like to participate in reducing the backlog of NPP as well. I was previously denied this right for some reasons, and during a heated exchange with some of you guys, I was blocked from PERMS (the full details are on my user page). Now, nearly two months have passed, and I still want to help. I want to make one thing clear: anyone is completely free to decline this request, and I will wait longer. It’s all up to you. Thanks! GrabUp - Talk 06:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

@GrabUp Can you clarify the "some reasons" you were denied this right, and what has changed since then? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@Ahecht: Hello, Thank you for asking. At that time, I was advised to wait and gain more experience, particularly in deletion-related processes, and to allow more time to build trust that I wouldn’t misuse those permissions or hat-collect. I admit that back then, I was somewhat impatient, and I fully recognize that that was my mistake.

Since then, I’ve worked extensively to improve my skills. I’ve gained significant experience not only in deletion but also in article creation, and I’ve actively contributed to fighting vandalism. Unfortunately, because of this mess, my rollback rights weren’t extended. Anyways, I want to add that I’ve not engaged in any behavior that could be seen as disrespectful or inappropriate toward others after that issue in June.

Currently, I have over 229 votes in Articles for Deletion discussions, I have created 289 articles including films and BLP articles (majorly stubs) and continuing to create more, I’ve been doing AfC reviewing and have done 668 reviews (many were Speedy deleted), and my log shows numerous CSD reports (majorly because of AfC). I was blocked on June 6, which will mark five months as of tomorrow, with my block expiring two months ago. I understand this request may still feel a bit soon, but given my works and experience I have gained, I hope it demonstrates that I can be trusted again.

Of course, the final decision is up to you or others, and I would completely understand if my request is declined, as I know my previous behavior led to this situation. Thanks again! GrabUp - Talk 15:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@GrabUp Thanks for the clarification. Since several other admins have already been involved here (Joe Roe, Extraordinary Writ, HickoryOughtShirt?4, hey man im josh), I'll leave it up to them. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Initially, I was unhappy with GrabUp's behaviour. But, they've spent a while on the NPP Discord, where I've seen them having discussions about notability and taking the steps that I would hope one to if they had an interest in NPP work. They've also been participating at deletion discussions, including nominations of their own. I'm willing to give them a trial at this point in time.

Done for 3 months. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Josh! GrabUp - Talk 15:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:عماد الدين المقدسي

عماد الدين المقدسي (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been a registered user on Wikipedia for several years, with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. I possess a strong understanding of content policies and guidelines, supported by my experience in quality control processes. I have actively participated in deletion processes like AfD, PROD, and CSD, contributed to Articles for Creation, and written new articles. I maintain a solid track record of interacting civilly and constructively with other editors, especially newcomers. I have no active behavioral blocks or 3RR violations within the last 6 months, and I am committed to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis. Imad_J (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([21]). — MusikBot ^talk 19:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

عماد الدين المقدسي, could you please address the concerns I raised at your last permissions request? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:CharlieMehta

CharlieMehta (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am reaching out to formally request permanent New Page Reviewer rights on Wikipedia. I recently completed and successfully passed the New Page Patrol (NPP) School evaluation under DreamRimmer's mentorship, where I received thorough training for 3 months in Wikipedia’s guidelines, best practices, and standards for reviewing new pages. This experience has deepened my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and strengthened my commitment to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia as a valuable resource. Previously, I held temporary NPP rights, which expired on September 11, 2024. Charlie (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Done _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Mims Mentor

Mims Mentor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights as I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for over 5 years, primarily focusing on editing and removing potential vandalism, particularly in articles related to the Indian entertainment and the beauty pageant industry. I am now eager to expand my contributions by assisting in reviewing newly created articles, ensuring they meet the necessary criteria to become stand-alone pages on Wikipedia.--Mims Mentor (talk) 17:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Not done Sorry @Mims Mentor but you don't meet the NPR guidelines. I would seriously recommend attending WP:NPP_school, I did it and it really made me a better editor. Alternatively you can show you understand the policies and rules by participating at WP:AFD. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Bpuddin

Bpuddin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to be a reviewer and go through the backlog of politician articles in the Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reports/Easy reviews. Many of them are state-level legislators who meet the guidelines set in WP:NSUBPOL. I am still relatively new to Wikipedia and still learning a lot of the rules and guidelines, but I know I can review many of the American politicians on the easy review page.

If you need additional information from me, please let me know. Bpuddin (talk) 01:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 365 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Not done. Sorry, but you do not currently meet the NPR guidelines for granting. You also do not appear to have enough relevant experience with notability guidelines, which can be showcased by making policy based votes with explanations at WP:AFD. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Lordseriouspig

Lordseriouspig (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to request permanent NPP rights (or an extension) after my trial period. Unfortunatly, in the seccond month, I was not able to be as active as I'd like, but I believe I would make a good NPR. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 07:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Lordseriouspig 07:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Done granted a 45 day extension, if you run into issues or feel overwhelmed please feel free to look into WP:NPP_school. I completed it and I have found it very helpful. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Stranger43286

Stranger43286 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I love Wikipedia! When I learned creating pages, I start to like it more. But I see many vandalism in many articles. Some hoax article are created. Also there is article cover events that not notable.

To prevent those, I want to request the new page reviewer rights. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 157 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 12:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Not done. Sorry, but you do not currently meet the NPR guidelines for granting. You also do not appear to have enough relevant experience with notability guidelines, which can be showcased by making policy based votes with explanations at WP:AFD. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

Wikibear47 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would love to start reviewing new articles having experienced the backend workings of Wikipedia. I have reasonable understanding of the policies involved. Always happy to learn more. Thanks! Wikibear47 (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Toadspike

Toadspike (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'd like to be able to take care of technical requests like the one I just posted [22], instead of having to wait for someone else to do them. I've participated in several move discussions and even closed a few – having this userright would also make it easier to close RMs. As far as I can see, all of my technical requests have been performed, and none of my RM closes have been contested. Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Done for a three-month trial; feel free to re-request a week or two before it expires. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:BittersweetParadox

BittersweetParadox (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TyphoonAmpil

TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, and I helping to review pending changes. Thanks. Ampil ^{(Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns)} 02:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([23]). — MusikBot ^talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Done granted for 75 days. I see that you are on a wiki break so I gave you a little buffer. If you still want this permission please ping me before it expires. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

Wikibear47 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

The pending changes reviewer will help me improve my ability to combat vandalism on Wikipedia. I have a good understanding of the relevant policies. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Edasf

Edasf (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Expand my works on Wikipedia.I want to counter vandalism and help Wikipedia by reviewing pending changes fastily and correctly. I have read all guidelines and policy I have also created some articles.Edasf (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

@Edasf You have less than 1,000 edits but you have a good record of contributions. I haven't really seen anything in your history showing that you've done any previous vandalism work. If you could point me to some of your work showing you've been doing working in that space let me know. Also look into attending WP:CVSCHOOL I think you would learn a lot there. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

@Dr vulpes I used to do vandalism counter edits recently although recently I am more focused on creating and improving articles.If you still want I can give links to them. I don't necessarily want this I am just wanting this to help Wikipedia in reviewing constructive changes. Edasf (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Done granted for 60 days, thanks for getting back to me. If you want this renewed make sure to ping me before it expires and I'll review your work at that time. Thanks for helping out! Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Avishai11

Avishai11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I love helping with new edits and making sure they are 100% correct and appropriate! I would love to help even more with this permission. Avishai11 (talk) 20:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Done Granted for 60 days, feel free to request an extension here again before it expires. Ping me and I'll try and handle it as soon as possible. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Mims Mentor

Mims Mentor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights. I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for over 5 years, with a strong focus on editing and combating vandalism. I am now keen to broaden my role by helping to review newly created articles, ensuring they meet Wikipedia's standards to qualify as stand-alone pages.--— MimsMENTOR ^talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC) — MimsMENTOR ^talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@Mims Mentor I've granted you this permission for 60 days. I fully believe that you can do this as you have a long record of edits. I was just a little concerned about the number of edits you have. Keep in mind this is not a reflection on you, I've been an administrator for less than a day so I may be mistaken and could just be overly cautious. After the trial period if you still want to keep this permission feel free to come back and request it here. Ping me and I'll review your request as soon as I'm able. If you run into any problems or issues feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:MSLQr

MSLQr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Being a recent changes patroller for a while, I am already well aware of the content polices concerned with NPOV, NOR, BLPs and CV. I have also been using Twinkle and AntiVandal tools for a while to combat especially vandalism and unsourced changes to articles. I've read about the feature and the guidelines regarding reviewing process. I think my editing history is enough to meet the criteria making me applicable to review the pending changes. MSLQr (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:QEnigma

QEnigma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been patrolling recent changes and reverting vandalism for some time. In addition, I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating new articles and improving existing ones.

During my recent changes patrol, I have often encountered articles with a "pending review" tag. I would like to assist by accepting constructive edits that are supported by verifiable sources, or by declining edits that do not meet criteria. I would be obliged if I could be granted "Pending changes reviewer" rights to support this work. Thank you. QEnigma (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Rasteem

Rasteem (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I respectfully request Rollback access to facilitate the use of Huggle, which will allow me to promptly and efficiently revert vandalism. I've been monitoring Recent Changes for the past 2-3 months, reverting disruptive edits.

I'm familiar with some Wikipedia policies, including: Reporting repeated vandals after 4 talk page warnings at WP:AIV, reporting reporting sock puppet accounts at WP:SPI and following the 3-revert rule (WP:3RR). And also I'm familiar with the use of Twinkle. ®asteem Talk 20:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 21:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Fastily, I'm already using Twinkle. I've warned many users for vandalism, but I don't warn new users who have made only one edit, as per "Back Biting" guideline. Instead, I typically warn a user after their second vandalism attempt. But in future I'll consider warning users even after one non-constructive edit. ®asteem Talk 21:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

No, that is incorrect. You need to be leaving notifications (or warnings) for every revert, regardless of how many edits the user has made or whether this is the user's first instance of vandalism. -Fastily 01:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

{{Done}} I'll always leave a warning notice on their talk page without digging into their number of edits. ®asteem Talk ®asteem Talk 01:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Great, could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will always be notifying all editors when you revert their edits? Also please don't use {{Done}} or {{Not done}} in your replies to me; on this page at least, these are for admin use only. -Fastily 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I'll do RC patrol & will always notify users when I revert their changes. I sincerely apologize for using {done} or {not done} previously. ®asteem Talk 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for template editor

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

(add request · view requests)

User:Hilst

Hilst (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm requesting template editor rights so that I can perform template mergers more easily (like the one me and Rjjiii completed over at {{Archive}}) and for moving prep areas to queues at DYK. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 21:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~3)
Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~20.5k)
Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~600)
Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 2)
N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3)

Primefac (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Not done, mainly per lack of demonstrated need, but with no prejudice against a future request when the need has been demonstrated. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

This dashboard (talk)

Category tracker

Immediate requests

Category	Entries
Wikipedians looking for help	1
Requests for unblock	97
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	2
Candidates for speedy deletion	13
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	7

Deletion

Category	Entries
Articles for deletion	567
Templates for deletion	141
Categories for deletion	114
Wikipedia files for discussion	23
All redirects for discussion	412
Miscellaneous pages for deletion	17
Possible copyright violations	27
All articles proposed for deletion	255
All files proposed for deletion	19
Unsorted AfD debates	0
All files with the same name on Commons	2

Image copyright problems

Category	Entries
Orphaned non-free use	368
Unknown copyright status	41
Unknown source	32
No non-free use rationale	4
Replaceable non-free use images	15
Disputed non-free use images	9

Page protection

Category	Entries
Protected	10
Semi-protected user and user talk pages	1,240
Fully protected user and user talk pages	443
Protected against vandalism	4
Protected talk pages of blocked users	34
Semi-protected	2,342
Arbitration 500/30 restricted	0

Cleanup

Category	Entries	Percentage
General cleanup
All pages needing cleanup	34,261	0.5
All articles needing rewrite	5,963	0.09
All articles needing expert attention	1,327	0.02
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating	39,577	0.57
Reference problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
All pages needing factual verification	11,105	0.16
All articles with unsourced statements	531,937	7.7
All articles lacking sources	78,271	1.13
All unreferenced BLPs	371	0.03
All articles needing additional references	469,449	6.8
All articles needing references cleanup	4,618	0.07
All articles lacking in-text citations	105,562	1.53
All articles with dead external links	311,884	4.52
Image cleanup problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
Image files for cleanup	17	-
Wikipedia files lacking a description	144	-
Wikipedia files with unknown source	17	-
Other problems
Category	Entries	Percentage
All articles to be merged	1,385	0.02
All articles to be split	805	0.01
Unsorted Stubs	1	-
Stub categories	19,247	-
All uncategorized pages	800	0.01
All orphaned articles	53,401	0.77
All articles needing copy edit	2,527	0.04
All articles with style issues	19,437	0.28
All Wikipedia articles needing context	2,755	0.04
All articles that may contain original research	16,567	0.24

Miscellaneous

Category	Entries
Requested moves	296
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes	7,545
All accuracy disputes	15,762
Articles with invalid ISBNs	0
Articles with invalid ISSNs	4
All articles to be expanded	66,178

Special pages

Maintenance reports	Information
Broken redirects
Dead-end pages	Dead-end pages
Dormant pages	Dusty articles
DoubleRedirects	Double redirects
Lonely pages	Orphaned articles
Long pages
New pages	New page patrol
New pages feed	Page curation
Protected pages	Protection policy
Short pages
Uncategorized	Categorization
Uncategorized cats
Uncategorized templates
Unused categories
Unused files (images)
Unused templates
Without interwiki links
Most interwiki links

Sub-page listing

User:Winhunter/Userboxes

Hong Kong

Misc

Delete

Keep

Neutral

Oppose

Support

Note

Template

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter.

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

v t e Noticeboards
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles and content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Wikipedia noticeboards

Articles I...

Created

Expanded significantly

My other accounts

My bookmarks

Wikipedia

Category

Misc

Tools

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

User-reported

Current requests for increase in protection level

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Gaza genocide 2

Handled requests

Autopatrolled

AutoWikiBrowser

Confirmed

Extended confirmed

File mover

New page reviewer

Page mover

Pending changes reviewer

Rollback

Template editor

Immediate requests

Deletion

Image copyright problems

Page protection

Cleanup

Miscellaneous

Special pages

Sub-page listing

Hong Kong

Misc