Talk:UltraEdit

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Unicode Support

UltraEdit can open unicode file names (at least middle-European and Nordic) - it does not open file names containing Kanji only, and mixed Kanji/ASCII7 as 8.3 (Windows XP, UEStudio 9). It has full support for UTF8/16 (both BE and LE), including support for decomposed characters (interestingly enough, the "ḱṷṓn (U+006B U+0301 U+0075 U+032D U+006F U+0304 U+0301 U+006E" Comparing precomposed and decomposed characters example is displayed correctly, unlike in most of the browsers I've seen so far). 84.63.240.214 (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find that it opens files the name of which is entirely in Kanji without any problem.Bellthorpe (talk) 11:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About License

What is the license of UltraEdit?
Zhangyunfan 22:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not free or open source if that is what you want to know. 2 seconds of Google-Fu. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 01:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not spam!

There are a lot of FLOSS fanatics on Wikipedia trying to label every article covering a commercial software product not made by Microsoft / Apple as spam, often resulting in edit wars. Some little open source project used by only a handful of people gets a detailed article, but a product that's been used by over a million people, like UltraEdit[1] is labeled for speedy deletion. If this continues, it will become a major liability for Wikipedia's reputation in the future. -AlexLibman 23:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree; I doubt those who put this up for deletion are programmers at all.Springbreak04 19:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New section requested: Releases

It would be nice with a section named "Releases" with a least version numbers and release dates for the various versions of UltraEdit.

Example, for Eclipse.

--Mortense (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised this section is still not included. I checked the mfg website and Wikipedia and cannot find version release dates nor end-of-life dates for versions.

--kbachman 5/15/2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.177.52.245 (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Respected program

Rather surprised that there's no mention of how respected this program is within the hacking community. Ultraedit is used as one of the tutorials on many hacking sites as an advanced example of how to obtain a registration code. And then afterwards, students are encouraged to register the program since it's a very good tool and the respect many have towards it. I know I registered my copy way back when I first started out and renew with every new version that comes out just to support the author. (And that's with living on a disability check.)

Also it;s one of the few editors, at least that I've been able to find, that can handle very large multiple meg files. Most editors choke on them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.131.155.12 (talk) 13:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]