Talk:Crocodiles (album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crocodiles (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Crocodiles (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>
[edit]- All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]This review is transcluded from Talk:Crocodiles (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Firstly, just as a note for the future, the GA reviewer generally creates this page... you just need to add the template to the talk page. :)
- Ah you're right! Just noticed that when I double checked, I'll remember for next time!
- "Singles released by the band and included on the album" - bleh... could you trim this to something like "SINGLE 1 and SINGLE 2 were released as singles"... it's a bit wordy as is.
- Done
- "was produced by Ian Broudie and by Bill Drummond and David Balfe." - overuse of "and", etc.
- Reworded to try to show that Drummond and Balfe produced the album and Broudie produced "Rescue".
- "author Chris Adams said that in 1980 Creem magazine had written" - took me a while to work out what was being said here... perhaps "in 1980 Cream magazine wrote..." or another reword?
- Reworded. I had originally used that to try to show it was a tertiary source.
- "Although Sergeant was less happy and said" - starting a sentence with "although" is weird...
- Removed "Although"
- "the following year, 1990." - you say 1989 last sentence, so you don't need to say the year here... it's pretty clear.
- Fixed
- The Commons template isn't really appropriate, and does MTV have permission to post up those lyrics (otherwise copyvio issues)?
- Removed commons (legacy of an earlier editor) and yes MTV have a licence for lyrics.
The rest seems good! giggy (:O) 11:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks --JD554 (talk) 14:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.
Cheers, giggy (:O) 14:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Length
[edit]The album length shown in the info box is the length of the US/cassette version with the two bonus tracks. The length of the original version is less than 33 minutes. 84.198.246.199 (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Crocodiles (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article requirements: A relatively complete infobox The lead section of this article contains minimal information, but should be expanded to meet the style guide at WP:LEAD. Contributors may wish to refer to Wikipedia:ALBUM#Article_body for some other ideas of material to include in the overview. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 12:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crocodiles (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090216030547/http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=1999 to http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=1999
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)