Jump to content

Talk:Neologism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateNeologism is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseNot kept

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Kstraatmann.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The following recently deleted link is moved here:

  • Langmaker.com, a regularly updated directory of over 1,100 invented languages and neographies.

According to the root link, http://www.langmaker.com, the Langmaker website has been "temporarily" disabled. It is moved here so that it may be checked from time to time to see if it has been re-enabled. Then it may be added back to the article. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting to note that the Langmaker site has been archived. The web archive is at:

Apparently, the wiki-ish website is down for the count. These archived pages are searchable and might still prove useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paine Ellsworth (talkcontribs) 00:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

create page: neologicism

[edit]

neological (adjective)

  1. Of or pertaining to neology
  2. Of or pertaining to neologicism (modern logicism which accepts the difference between proof, substantiality and experimental axiomatic systems).

2A02:2149:8B83:6500:7813:142C:413A:4290 (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless

[edit]

The current page states "is any newly formed word, term, or phrase that nevertheless has achieved popular or institutional recognition and is becoming accepted into mainstream language". Nevertheless what? It isn't clear even in the initial edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neologism&oldid=1158732740

It's a bit odd that an article around linguistics has held a semantically meaningless summary for a year. I have no formal background in the field and hesitate to correct the grammar as I'm quite certain I'll fall foul of the classic trope. Youse lot generally think ussins need to wise the bap, so I'll houl me wisht.

BeardedChimp (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]