User talk:Johngelles

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!
Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Notability of Keynes Without Debt

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Keynes Without Debt, by Wikidudeman (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Keynes Without Debt seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Keynes Without Debt, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Keynes Without Debt itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Functional finance

A tag has been placed on Functional finance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FlyingToaster (talk) 04:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Inflation-protected Cash Savings Accounts

I have nominated Inflation-protected Cash Savings Accounts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inflation-protected Cash Savings Accounts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jac16888 (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Functional Finance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Functional Finance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:OR, WP:SPAM, WP:N. Appears to be attempt to push a paper by the article's author.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ray (talk) 02:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Functional Finance

A tag has been placed on Functional Finance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Christopher Kraus (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keynesian Resurgence

Hi John, I hope you dont mind if I reply to you here concerning what we were discussing on the Keynesian resurgence artitcle.

I had a quick search to see if I could find any sources to support the POV you advanced in your contribution. I didnt find anything suitable , but I did come across this excellent FT article where Martin Wolf offers an excellent view of the overall debt problem. I hope you find it useful.

I saw that someone removed your section from the main article, and I cant really argue against that decision as to be frank it was blatantly non compliant with the three core wikki policies. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view ,Verifiability and No original research.

I understand you feel your view needs to brought to the attention of the worlds experts , and maybe you are right. Possible options are either to re-write the section to comply with the wikkie policies above, or you could just post your view however you like direcly to the experts. Many leading economists have blogs or participate in forums which are easy to find with google. Hope this helps and good luck, as we discussed it would be great if more can be done to tackle the debt problem. FeydHuxtable (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DBMS

Your comments make little (or no) sense and appear randomly inserted in the Basic Debate section for no good reason. Please try to integrate them into the body of the article better. Or delete them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrisisFeedsLeviathan (talk • contribs) 00:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]