Talk:Government of Hong Kong

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Hong Kong Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,033)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,442) • Stub-Class articles (6,728)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move request

Original request

Should this article be renamed Hong Kong Government? That's the short form actually used. — Insta ntnood 06:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

no, keep consistency with other articles. "Government of Country" and "Foo of Country". Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Those are topical articles about countries, this article is not. — Insta ntnood 20:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

and this leads to the conclusion to not use same-structure article names? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 12:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. they're not actually referring to exactly the same thing, despite the same words. The government of the United States and government of France articles are topical that talk about all three branches of government, while this article specifically talks about the executive organ, which is parallel to examples such as Scottish Executive, Government of Sweden or Government of the United Kingdom. — Insta ntnood 12:54, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This should be changed. Are you english native? What would you suggest for the whole cat. I would not like to rely on subtle differences like "G o HK" vs "HK G". It seems as if the 3-branch-article GoHK is missing? Topical articles seem to be needed to me, is there a better (more neutral) wording than GoFoo for them? Or do you have a solution how to call the executive branches? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 20:08, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The topical government of Foo article is missing for many countries, usually redirected and covered by the politics of Foo article. There's no easy solution since the English word government possesses slightly different and closely related meanings, and it is what the executive organs are officially called in some countries. Unlike languages like German that have different words (Regierung and Staatsgewalt) for different meanings, there's only one word in English. — Insta ntnood 20:29, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

and the US usage of "Administration" does not make things much better. How about all topical to GoFoo? Then the current HK should be moved. Which Blabla by country cat would it go to (if it is a country at all, but I don't want to go into that discusion)? What to do with SE (sweden) and UK? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:10, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Topical "government of Foo" articles only exist for a few countries. For most countries it's covered by the "politics of Foo" articles. Don't think there's a general rule to title the articles on the executive organs of other countries, since that depends on how those countries named their executive organs, e.g. "Government of Foo", "Fooian Government", "Fooian Executive", etc. As for category, category:government of Scotland and category:Scottish Executive is a good example to follow. — Insta ntnood 11:24, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

The page was not moved, due to a lack of consensus. Rob Church ^Talk 07:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Archive of WP:RFD discussion

The Hong Kong Government → Government of Hong Kong redirect was nominated for deletion at WP:RFD. The result of the discussion was to keep the redirect. The discussion is being archived here at the redirect target's talk page as per RFD policy. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 11:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Government → Government of Hong Kong — no objection at talk:Government of Hong Kong to move from the latter to the former. Has been listed on WP:RM. — Insta ntnood 17:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No objection at talk:Government of Hong Kong ??? Come on !!! There was no support to move, either. The "request to move" was closed last month due to a lack of consensus. The redirect should stay till there is a consensus to move. --PFHLai 16:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Delete the redirect when the page is moved. There's no reason to delete it in advance. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 13:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

To move this article about the executive branch to Hong Kong Government, which is its conventional and officially used short name. The government of Hong Kong should be a topical article on the government aspect, i.e. the three branches. — Insta ntnood 11:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Support. I see no reason not to use the official name. Furthermore, "government" in this sense is confusing to American English speakers, which makes the official name that much better. - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 19:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This looks like a repeat of the redirect debate. The current official title is "Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" so I see no problem with "Government of Hong Kong". And http://www.info.gov.hk/orgindex.htm does not suggest the distinction you are making. --Henrygb 22:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The official title is "Government of the Hong Kong Special Adminsitrative Region of the People's Republic of China", and it refers only to the executive branch, which officially used short name is "Hong Kong Government". The "government of Hong Kong" article should be a topical article, like that of the US, France, Japan for instance. — Instantnood 09:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

The government section of the "Outline of Hong Kong" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.

When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.

Please check that this country's outline is not in error.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .

Thank you.

Name of the article

Should the name of this article be called "Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region"? Semantically, the term Hong Kong Government refers to the colonial government, between 1842 to 1997. Bourquie (talk) 09:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Government of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article protected for 48 hours

I've just protected the article for 48 hours to end the current edit war (protection applied on whatever version is current at this time - please see m:The Wrong Version before complaining!). Nick-D (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong move. What you ought to have done is blocked the IP user who was deleting sourced material and refusing to provide any edit summary whatsoever to explain such deletions. It's a no-brainer, if WP has any brains. sirlanz 08:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Executive authorities

Is there a reason that the lede says the HKSAR Government "is the executive authorities of Hong Kong" rather than the executive authority (subject-verb agreement, as it is a single entity) or simply the executive, as suggested by the article that is linked? It seems like a typographical error but perhaps the use of plural has meaning I don't apprehend.

The executive (or executive branch) is usually a part of a government, not the government entire. Are other usual governmental functions that complement executive power, like legislative and judicial functions, external to the HKSAR Government as described in this article? Should the first line of this article not say "holds the executive power for Hong Kong" or (tautologically) "is the government of Hong Kong"? 3580ca (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]