Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Order of St. Patrick
An article I wrote long ago, but neglected to nominate. -- Emsworth 21:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Yet another to add to your œuvre. James F. (talk) 21:59, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There seems to be some unresolved suggestion that the article should perhaps be at Order of St. Patrick - perhaps it should be at Order of Saint Patrick, instead? Otherwise, support. john k 22:49, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. --DanielNuyu 00:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support - I can't not support an article with one of my photographs in it. :-) re the Saint/St question. I thought we wrote saint for people, and st/st. for buildings named after saints. I've never seen the Order written as saint, always st or rather st.. Without a dot it looks rather, um, naked and unfinished or something. Everyone I know in Ireland and Britain uses the period. The only people I know who don't are Americans!FearÉIREANN 01:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Can't we have a picture more near the top of the article? I think it should be moved to Order of St. Patrick (with the dot) with redirects at the other locations. Mgm|(talk) 16:28, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Support, although I agree that a photo nearer the top of the article, perhaps a color close-up of the star or badge, would be an improvement. Edeans 16:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- minor object needs a good leading image, once thats taken care of support. ALKIVAR™ 20:02, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm. The orphan couple sentence paragraphs make the lead read choppily. Can you integrate them together to flow better? There's one later on too. I agree, could really use a lead image too. - Taxman 22:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
- I addressed the issue of the short paragraphs. -- Emsworth 22:45, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)