Talk:Paul Gallico

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

==sexism? They never manage entirely to escape a vague hint of burlesque about the entire business. A generation ago they were funny in a mild way because they tried to play competitive games and at the same time maintain their maidenly modesty. Today they manage to be amusing for exactly the opposite reason; they play with complete abandon and exposure, and as if that were not enough, the mores and morals of the times have made possible deliciously frank and biological discussions in the columns of the newspapers as to whether this or that famous woman athlete should be addressed as “Miss,” “Mrs.,” “Mr.,” or “It.”

He further asserts that women are genetically suited for golf. “The game is a natural reagent for the cattiness that is in woman,” he wrote. Female track and field athletes? “Flat chested, most of them with close cropped hair. Not much on looks either.” Women who want to box, wrestle, or play ball? “For the most part they have ugly bodies, hard faces, cheap minds.”

However, The Snow Goose did not win "the" O. Henry Prize

...contrary to the statement on one website. The first prize winner was Kay Boyle's "Defeat", second Eudora Welty's "The Long Path," third Hallie Southgate Abbett "Eighteenth Summer." See The O. Henry Prize stories. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:28, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

"The Snow Goose", published in the Saturday Evening Post is among those listed under Best First-Published story.[1] Mannanan51 (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, being included in the anthology is considered to be "a prize." "First prize" (and sometimes other ranked prizes" is a special designation in the annual volume. Hifrommike65 (talk) 07:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Story/book/movie/musical: Love of Seven Dolls, Lili, Carnival!

Working notes, things that may get worked into the article, or, more likely, a separate article—probably under the heading Lili.

imbd and the New York Times review of "Carnival" credit it as "a musical, based on material by Helen Deutsch, from Paul Gallico's story 'The Seven Souls of Clement O'Reilly.'" The review and all descriptions of the musical describe it as "derived from the film, 'Lili.'" However, the imdb description of "Lili" describes it as based on the Gallico book Love of Seven Dolls as do other sources. The actual onscreen credits, at least on a VHS copy, simply say it is "from a story by Paul Gallico." The book, "Love of Seven Dolls," does not mention a magazine story on the copyright page or elsewhere. It is copyright 1954, apparently making it later than the movie. It is dedicated to Burr Tillstrom and Fran Allison (of Kukla, Fran, and Ollie).

I can't find a copy of the story. Presumably the book and the movie each derive separately from the story?

The New York Times (Nov 28, 1954; p. BR4) review of the book does not mention the story, and says "Those audiences still making their way to see 'Lili' may now read the book from which this motion picture was adapted."

(!) Lili opened on March 10th, 1953; Knock on Wood, the Danny Kaye movie about a ventriloquist who can express his real self only through his dummy, opened April 15th, 1954... Lili is utterly free of any "psychiatric" background, even hinted, while Knock On Wood revels in it (the ventriloquist falls in love with a "lady psychiatrist" ([sic], Bosley Crowther's terminology).

no "Mrs 'arris" novels?

I find it peculiar that this entry has no mention of his very popular novel "Mrs 'arris goes to Paris", even though it has a Wiki entry of its own.Saxophobia 08:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write about them because I don't happen to know much about them.

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. ... Be bold... etc.

I touched up the existing "Mrs 'Arris" page slightly, but I don't know how to make a link properly. Actually there's not a lot to say about Mrs 'Arris. Gallico produced a lot of potboilers- well written novels but pretty slight in substance, many of them suspence themed like "The Hand of Mary Constable" with it's faked seance.Saxophobia 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the link--I'm glad this discussion was here, or I wouldn't have realized that the 'Mrs. 'Arris' page existed! Marieblasdell 07:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might also be worth adding that 'Mrs 'Arris Goes to Paris' was also published as 'Flowers For Mrs Harris' - it is, I think, the British title or something. 137.92.97.111 (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Kat[reply]

His British connections?

Many (most?) of Gallico's novels are set in Britain or have a British background. Did he live there? I think we need some more biographical detail -- there's nothing after 1942. Hypnopomp 20:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bibliography

I don't like the "light, Sport" additions that were just made to the bibliography. I find them distracting and not very important. Can we remove them please? --Knulclunk (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Gallico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.angelfire.com/mi3/cookarama/nbctodayoct00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041127001833/http://www.paulgallico.info/ to http://www.paulgallico.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of documentation and references

This article is woefully short on documentation. It reads like a summary of standard library references such as Current Biography or the Gale Contemporary Authors series. Even direct quotes are not referenced. That prevents this article from being encyclopedic and hurts its credibility. Hifrommike65 (talk) 07:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]